Suppr超能文献

胸段食管癌根治性放化疗后挽救性食管切除术

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Miyata Hiroshi, Yamasaki Makoto, Takiguchi Shuji, Nakajima Kiyokazu, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki, Nishida Toshiro, Mori Masaki, Doki Yuichiro

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;100(6):442-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.21353.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although locoregional failure frequently occurs after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the role of salvage esophagectomy has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of salvage esophagectomy after high-dose definitive CRT with neoadjuvant CRT.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2007, 33 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT, and 115 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery.

RESULTS

The postoperative mortality rate in the salvage group (12%) was higher than in the neoadjuvant group (3.6%, P = 0.059). The rates of postoperative complications were significantly higher in the salvage group than in neoadjuvant group: Anastomotic leakage (39% vs. 22%, respectively, P = 0.049), bleeding (15% vs. 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.002), cardiovascular complications (24% vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that pretherapy T stage, pretherapy lymph node status, pathological T stage, and operative curability were significant prognostic factors affecting survival of patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy. In particular, patients with cT3-T4 tumors or cN1 tumors before definitive CRT showed worse prognosis after salvage esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose definitive CRT was associated with higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with neoadjuvant CRT. Only selected patients can be rescued by salvage esophagectomy.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管在根治性放化疗(CRT)后局部区域复发频繁发生,但挽救性食管切除术的作用尚未得到充分评估。本研究的目的是比较大剂量根治性CRT后挽救性食管切除术与新辅助CRT的疗效。

方法

1994年至2007年,33例胸段食管癌患者在根治性CRT后接受了挽救性食管切除术,115例患者接受了新辅助CRT后再行手术。

结果

挽救组的术后死亡率(12%)高于新辅助组(3.6%,P = 0.059)。挽救组的术后并发症发生率显著高于新辅助组:吻合口漏(分别为39%对22%,P = 0.049)、出血(分别为15%对1.7%,P = 0.002)、心血管并发症(分别为24%对5.4%,P = 0.001)。单因素分析显示,治疗前T分期、治疗前淋巴结状态、病理T分期和手术可切除性是影响接受挽救性食管切除术患者生存的重要预后因素。特别是,在根治性CRT前为cT3 - T4期肿瘤或cN1期肿瘤的患者,挽救性食管切除术后预后较差。

结论

与新辅助CRT相比,大剂量根治性CRT后的挽救性食管切除术与更高的术后死亡率和发病率相关。只有部分患者可通过挽救性食管切除术得到救治。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验