Vinciguerra Luisa, Bösel Julian
Department GF Ingrassia, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Aug;27(1):122-140. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0361-8.
Noninvasive neuromonitoring is increasingly being used to monitor the course of primary brain injury and limit secondary brain damage of patients in the neurocritical care unit. Proposed advantages over invasive neuromonitoring methods include a lower risk of infection and bleeding, no need for surgical installation, mobility and portability of some devices, and safety. The question, however, is whether noninvasive neuromonitoring is practical and trustworthy enough already. We searched the recent literature and reviewed English-language studies on noninvasive neuromonitoring in subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke between the years 2010 and 2015. We found 88 studies that were eligible for review including the methods transcranial ultrasound, electroencephalography, evoked potentials, near-infrared spectroscopy, bispectral index, and pupillometry. Noninvasive neuromonitoring cannot yet completely replace invasive methods in most situations, but has great potential being complementarily integrated into multimodality monitoring, for guiding management, and for limiting the use of invasive devices and in-hospital transports for imaging.
无创神经监测越来越多地用于监测神经重症监护病房患者的原发性脑损伤进程,并限制继发性脑损伤。相对于有创神经监测方法,其优势包括感染和出血风险较低、无需手术植入、部分设备具有移动性和便携性以及安全性。然而,问题在于无创神经监测目前是否已经足够实用和可靠。我们检索了近期文献,并回顾了2010年至2015年间关于蛛网膜下腔出血、创伤性脑损伤以及缺血性和出血性卒中的无创神经监测的英文研究。我们发现有88项研究符合综述条件,包括经颅超声、脑电图、诱发电位、近红外光谱、脑电双频指数和瞳孔测量等方法。在大多数情况下,无创神经监测尚不能完全取代有创方法,但具有很大的潜力,可以互补性地整合到多模态监测中,用于指导治疗管理,并限制有创设备的使用以及减少用于成像的院内转运。