Sandvik Anniken, Lie Anne Kveim
Seksjon for miljø- og arbeidsmedisin Oslo Universitetssykehus, Ullevål.
Institutt for helse og samfunn Universitetet i Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2016 Dec 20;136(23-24):2010-2016. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0543. eCollection 2016 Dec.
In the period from 1891 - 1910, around 2000 patients with syphilis were admitted to the Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet. The head of the department, Cæsar Boeck (1845 - 1917), believed in allowing the disease to take its natural course and withheld treatment. He made detailed notes of the diagnosis and the clinical course of the disease for all his patients. Boeck's material is unique, and forms the basis for our current knowledge about the prognosis and course of syphilis infections. In 1928, the patients were scrutinised by Boeck's successor in the Department of Dermatology, Edvin Bruusgaard (1869 - 1934), and later by Trygve Gjestland (1911 - 1993). Gjestland's doctoral thesis from 1955 has remained as «The Oslo study of untreated syphilis.» This article presents a medical historical background for the study. Bruusgaard's and Gjestland's research was important for the Tuskegee Study in the USA, and the Oslo study gave implicit support to this research project, which posterity has emphatically condemned as ethically unacceptable.
在1891年至1910年期间,约2000名梅毒患者住进了奥斯陆大学医院里司医院皮肤科。该科室主任凯撒·伯克(1845 - 1917)认为应让疾病自然发展,不进行治疗。他为所有患者详细记录了疾病的诊断和临床病程。伯克的资料独一无二,构成了我们目前关于梅毒感染预后和病程知识的基础。1928年,皮肤科伯克的继任者埃德温·布鲁斯加德(1869 - 1934)对这些患者进行了详细检查,后来特里格韦·杰斯特兰(1911 - 1993)也进行了检查。杰斯特兰1955年博士论文留存至今,即《奥斯陆未经治疗梅毒研究》。本文介绍了该研究的医学历史背景。布鲁斯加德和杰斯特兰的研究对美国塔斯基吉研究很重要,奥斯陆研究也为该研究项目提供了隐性支持,而后人强烈谴责该研究项目在伦理上不可接受。