• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在单髁膝关节置换术中,机器人技术比传统技术能实现更保守的胫骨截骨。

Robotic Technology Produces More Conservative Tibial Resection Than Conventional Techniques in UKA.

作者信息

Ponzio Danielle Y, Lonner Jess H

机构信息

Adult Reconstruction, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec;45(7):E465-E468.

PMID:28005115
Abstract

Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be relatively simple when tibial resection is conservative during the index UKA. However, with greater tibial resection, conversion to TKA may be complicated by osseous insufficiency, requiring stems and augments, and potentially compromising patient outcomes and TKA durability. Robotic assistance in UKA is shown to enhance the bone preparation accuracy. In our retrospective comparison of polyethylene insert sizes, 8-mm or 9-mm polyethylene inserts were used in 93.6% and 84.5% of robotic (N = 8421) and conventional (N = 27,989) UKAs, respectively. Aggressive tibial resection, requiring tibial inserts ≥10 mm, was performed in 6.4% of robotic-assisted cases and 15.5% of conventional cases. Robotic-assisted UKA more reproducibly achieved accurate and precise conservative resection.

摘要

当初次单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)期间胫骨截骨较为保守时,将其转换为全膝关节置换术(TKA)可能相对简单。然而,随着胫骨截骨量增加,转换为TKA可能会因骨量不足而变得复杂,需要使用柄和增强装置,这可能会影响患者的预后以及TKA的耐用性。研究表明,UKA中的机器人辅助可提高骨准备的准确性。在我们对聚乙烯衬垫尺寸的回顾性比较中,机器人辅助UKA(N = 8421)和传统UKA(N = 27,989)分别有93.6%和84.5%使用了8毫米或9毫米的聚乙烯衬垫。在机器人辅助病例中,6.4%进行了需要≥10毫米胫骨衬垫的激进胫骨截骨,而在传统病例中这一比例为15.5%。机器人辅助UKA更可重复地实现了准确且精确的保守截骨。

相似文献

1
Robotic Technology Produces More Conservative Tibial Resection Than Conventional Techniques in UKA.在单髁膝关节置换术中,机器人技术比传统技术能实现更保守的胫骨截骨。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec;45(7):E465-E468.
2
Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees.与传统单髁膝关节置换术相比,内侧无图像机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术具有更高的准确性和植入物存活率:对连续356例膝关节进行2至11年的随访。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):533-541. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05640-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
An Experienced Surgeon Can Meet or Exceed Robotic Accuracy in Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.经验丰富的外科医生在手动单髁膝关节置换术中可以达到或超过机器人的准确性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):1479-1484. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00906.
4
Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术可改善植入物位置,降低翻修率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5081-5. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Revision of Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Unicompartmental Implant (Metal-Backed vs All-Polyethylene) Impact the Total Knee Arthroplasty?单髁关节置换翻修为全膝关节置换:单髁关节置换假体(金属背衬对全聚乙烯)是否会影响全膝关节置换?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2203-2209. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Do bone loss and reconstruction procedures differ at revision of cemented unicompartmental knee prostheses according to the use of metal-back or all-polyethylene tibial component?翻修骨水泥型单间室膝关节假体时,使用金属后壳或全聚乙烯胫骨组件是否会影响骨质丢失和重建过程?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Oct;99(6):687-92. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
7
Optimization of sagittal and coronal planes with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术中矢状面和冠状面的优化
Knee. 2017 Aug;24(4):837-843. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术中的衬垫厚度是翻修为全膝关节置换术中胫骨骨丢失的可靠预测指标。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):429-434. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
9
Midterm Survivorship of Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.机器人辅助外侧单髁膝关节置换术的中期生存率
J Arthroplasty. 2022 May;37(5):831-836. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
10
Effect of initial tibial resection thickness on outcomes of revision UKA.初次胫骨截骨厚度对英国单髁置换翻修术结果的影响。
Orthopedics. 2013 Apr;36(4):e409-14. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130327-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcome Scores Post Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the MAKO Robotic Arm versus the Oxford Conventional Approach.内侧单髁膝关节置换术后的临床结果评分:MAKO机器人手臂与牛津传统方法的比较
Malays Orthop J. 2025 Mar;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2503.002.
2
Posterior tibial slope considered as an important addition to the CPAK classification system.胫骨后倾坡度被认为是对CPAK分类系统的一项重要补充。
J Orthop. 2024 Jan 14;51:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.01.008. eCollection 2024 May.
3
The Deep-MCL Line: A Reliable Anatomical Landmark to Optimize the Tibial Cut in UKA.
深层内侧副韧带线:优化单髁膝关节置换术中胫骨截骨的可靠解剖标志。
J Pers Med. 2023 May 19;13(5):855. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050855.
4
Long-term study of functional outcomes of robotic assisted medial UKA using mid-vastus approach in a high-volume centre.机器人辅助内侧 UKA 采用股中肌下入路的高容量中心的功能结果的长期研究。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1599-1607. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01564-4. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
5
The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty-What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?计算机断层扫描在择期膝关节和髋关节置换术中的应用——它们能告诉我们什么以及有何风险?
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 5;15:132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.008. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术:综述
Arthroplasty. 2021 May 2;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00071-x.
7
[Biomechanical analysis of sitting-up movement of knee joint after robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].[机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术后膝关节仰卧起坐运动的生物力学分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 15;35(10):1259-1264. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101061.
8
Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty: The latest developments.机器人辅助关节置换术:最新进展。
Chin J Traumatol. 2022 May;25(3):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
9
Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术可实现更优的早期功能恢复,且更有可能达到患者预期。
Adv Orthop. 2021 Jul 14;2021:4770960. doi: 10.1155/2021/4770960. eCollection 2021.
10
Component placement accuracy in two generations of handheld robotics-assisted knee arthroplasty.两代手持机器人辅助膝关节置换术中的组件放置精度。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2059-2067. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04040-6. Epub 2021 Jul 25.