• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理教育的跨领域比较:黄金法则与细节

Cross-Field Comparison of Ethics Education: Golden Rules and Particulars.

作者信息

Mulhearn Tyler J, Watts Logan L, Torrence Brett S, Todd E Michelle, Turner Megan R, Connelly Shane, Mumford Michael D

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2017;24(4):211-224. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1274974. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2016.1274974
PMID:28005391
Abstract

Research misconduct negatively impacts the scientific community and society in general. Providing training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) to researchers is one viable approach to minimizing research misconduct. Although recent evidence suggests ethics training can indeed be effective, little empirical work has examined the similarities and differences across fields. In the present study, we analyzed 62 empirical studies in engineering, biomedical science, social science, and mixed fields. The findings suggest certain instructional principles, or "golden rules," apply generally to all fields. These golden rules include maintaining a field-specific or field-general approach and emphasizing processes in training. The findings also suggest that content areas contributing to instructional effectiveness vary as a function of field. Generally, it appears that all fields may benefit from taking a multi-pronged approach to ethics education wherein the salient field issues are covered. Implications for RCR education are discussed.

摘要

科研不端行为对科学界乃至整个社会都有负面影响。为研究人员提供负责任的研究行为(RCR)培训是将科研不端行为降至最低的一种可行方法。尽管最近的证据表明伦理培训确实可以有效,但很少有实证研究考察不同领域之间的异同。在本研究中,我们分析了工程学、生物医学科学、社会科学和混合领域的62项实证研究。研究结果表明,某些教学原则,即“黄金法则”,普遍适用于所有领域。这些黄金法则包括采用特定领域或通用领域的方法以及在培训中强调过程。研究结果还表明,对教学有效性有贡献的内容领域因领域而异。一般来说,所有领域似乎都可能从采取多管齐下的伦理教育方法中受益,其中涵盖突出的领域问题。文中讨论了对RCR教育的启示。

相似文献

1
Cross-Field Comparison of Ethics Education: Golden Rules and Particulars.伦理教育的跨领域比较:黄金法则与细节
Account Res. 2017;24(4):211-224. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1274974. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.在整个大学范围内扩大负责任的研究行为指导。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):876-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909.
3
The challenges for scientists in avoiding plagiarism.科学家在避免剽窃方面面临的挑战。
Account Res. 2014;21(6):353-65. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.877348.
4
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.评估关于科研行为责任的教育文献中的核心内容。
Account Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):207-24. doi: 10.1080/08989620500217420.
5
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?研究管理中的不当行为:它是什么?它有多普遍?我们应该对此做些什么?
Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(7):439-458. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.2020110. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
6
Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.科学伦理教育第二部分:医学研究人员在参加短期科学伦理课程后对科研欺诈态度的转变
J BUON. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):391-5.
7
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
8
Emphasizing the experiences of researchers after RCR instructions: Introduction to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) in Malaysia.强调研究者在接受研究伦理指导后的经验:马来西亚负责任研究行为(RCR)简介。
Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):157-175. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1607312. Epub 2019 May 5.
9
What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.科研行为责任方面的指导与培训和科学家的不当行为有何关系?来自一项对美国国立卫生研究院资助科学家的全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
10
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics in times of physical distancing: virtual training of ethical competences.物理距离时代的伦理学:伦理能力的虚拟培训。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc28. doi: 10.3205/zma001424. eCollection 2021.