Conti Rena M, Jones David K
University of Chicago.
Boston University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Apr;42(2):377-385. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3766771. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
The ACA entails a number of provisions that are profoundly changing the way the states ensure access to medical care, including the expansion of Medicaid and the maintenance of health insurance exchanges. Here, we argue that while federal policy is the originating force of whether these provisions are adopted, individual state decisions are made within a larger ecosystem. This ecosystem has two main components: (1) complementary and competing state and federal policies; and (2) medical provision by a variety of suppliers. Specifically, the merits, costs, and uncertainties associated with adopting these provisions cannot be considered by the states in a vacuum-they may interact with a large set of simultaneously launched or existing local, state, and federal policies aimed at ensuring access to medical care. They may also interact with specific state and federal reimbursement policies and other requirements facing local hospitals and medical providers. We illustrate by example how these interactions may have important implications for the diffusion of ACA provisions. One implication of this perspective is that future empirical work on the rate, determinants, and impacts of ACA coverage expansions on individual and aggregate well-being must incorporate systematic study of this complex public-private sector ecosystem.
《平价医疗法案》包含一些正在深刻改变各州确保医疗服务可及性方式的条款,包括医疗补助计划的扩大以及医疗保险交易所的维持。在此,我们认为,虽然联邦政策是这些条款是否被采纳的初始推动力,但各州的决策是在一个更大的生态系统中做出的。这个生态系统有两个主要组成部分:(1)相互补充和竞争的州及联邦政策;(2)各类供应商提供的医疗服务。具体而言,各州不能孤立地考虑采纳这些条款所涉及的优点、成本和不确定性——它们可能会与大量同时出台或现有的旨在确保医疗服务可及性的地方、州和联邦政策相互作用。它们还可能与特定的州和联邦报销政策以及地方医院和医疗服务提供者面临的其他要求相互作用。我们通过实例说明这些相互作用可能对《平价医疗法案》条款的推广产生重要影响。这一观点的一个含义是,未来关于《平价医疗法案》覆盖范围扩大的速度、决定因素及其对个人和总体福祉影响的实证研究,必须纳入对这个复杂的公私部门生态系统的系统研究。