• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用伽玛刀放射外科采用的评分标准对 Spetzler-Ponce 分级 A 和 B 级动静脉畸形进行显微手术治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Microsurgery for Spetzler-Ponce Class A and B arteriovenous malformations utilizing an outcome score adopted from Gamma Knife radiosurgery: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Departments of 1 Clinical Medicine and.

Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1105-1116. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS161275. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

DOI:10.3171/2016.8.JNS161275
PMID:28009228
Abstract

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to adapt and apply the extended definition of favorable outcome established for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to surgery for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). The aim was to derive both an error around the point estimate and a model incorporating angioarchitectural features in order to facilitate comparison among different treatments. METHODS A prospective microsurgical cohort was analyzed. This cohort included patients undergoing embolization who did not proceed to microsurgery and patients denied surgery because of perceived risk of treatment. Data on bAVM residual and recurrence during long-term follow-up as well as complications of surgery and preoperative embolization were analyzed. Patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class C bAVMs were excluded because of extreme selection bias. First, patients with a favorable outcome were identified for both Class A and Class B lesions. Patients were considered to have a favorable outcome if they were free of bAVM recurrence or residual at last follow-up, with no complication of surgery or preoperative embolization, and a modified Rankin Scale score of more than 1 at 12 months after treatment. Patients who were denied surgery because of perceived risk, but would otherwise have been candidates for surgery, were included as not having a favorable outcome. Second, the authors analyzed favorable outcome from microsurgery by means of regression analysis, using as predictors characteristics previously identified to be associated with complications. Third, they created a prediction model of favorable outcome for microsurgery dependent upon angioarchitectural variables derived from the regression analysis. RESULTS From a cohort of 675 patients who were either treated or denied surgery because of perceived risk of surgery, 562 had Spetzler-Ponce Class A or B bAVMs and were included in the analysis. Logistic regression for favorable outcome found decreasing maximum diameter (continuous, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.76), the absence of eloquent location (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.43), and the absence of deep venous drainage (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.10-0.36) to be significant predictors of favorable outcome. These variables are in agreement with previous analyses of microsurgery leading to complications, and the findings support the use of favorable outcome for microsurgery. The model developed for angioarchitectural features predicts a range of favorable outcome at 8 years following microsurgery for Class A bAVMs to be 88%-99%. The same model for Class B bAVMs predicts a range of favorable outcome of 62%-90%. CONCLUSIONS Favorable outcome, derived from GKRS, can be successfully used for microsurgical cohort series to assist in treatment recommendations. A favorable outcome can be achieved by microsurgery in at least 90% of cases at 8 years following microsurgery for patients with bAVMs smaller than 2.5 cm in maximum diameter and, in the absence of either deep venous drainage or eloquent location, patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class A bAVMs of all diameters. For patients with Class B bAVMs, this rate of favorable outcome can only be approached for lesions with a maximum diameter just above 6 cm or smaller and without deep venous drainage or eloquent location.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在将伽玛刀放射外科(GKRS)的有利结局扩展定义应用于脑动静脉畸形(bAVM)手术。目的是得出一个围绕点估计的误差,并建立一个包含血管构筑特征的模型,以便于不同治疗方法的比较。

方法 分析了前瞻性显微外科队列。该队列包括接受栓塞但未进行显微手术的患者,以及由于治疗风险而拒绝手术的患者。分析了长期随访期间 bAVM 残留和复发以及手术和术前栓塞并发症的数据。由于极端选择偏倚,排除了 Spetzler-Ponce 分级 C 的 bAVM 患者。首先,确定了 A 级和 B 级病变的有利结局患者。如果患者在最后一次随访时没有 bAVM 复发或残留,没有手术或术前栓塞并发症,并且在治疗后 12 个月的改良 Rankin 量表评分大于 1,则认为患者有良好的预后。由于手术风险而被拒绝手术的患者被认为没有良好的预后,但如果其他方面符合手术条件,则被认为没有良好的预后。其次,作者通过回归分析分析了显微外科的有利结局,使用先前确定的与并发症相关的特征作为预测因子。第三,他们根据回归分析中得出的血管构筑变量,为显微外科建立了有利结局的预测模型。

结果 在接受治疗或因手术风险而拒绝手术的 675 名患者队列中,562 名患者的 Spetzler-Ponce 分级 A 或 B bAVM 被纳入分析。有利结局的逻辑回归发现,最大直径减小(连续,OR 0.62,95%CI 0.51-0.76)、无功能区位置(OR 0.23,95%CI 0.12-0.43)和无深部静脉引流(OR 0.19,95%CI 0.10-0.36)是有利结局的显著预测因子。这些变量与先前分析导致并发症的显微外科一致,并且发现支持将有利结局用于显微外科。为血管构筑特征开发的模型预测,A 级 bAVM 患者在显微手术后 8 年,其良好预后的范围为 88%-99%。对于 B 级 bAVM,相同的模型预测其良好预后的范围为 62%-90%。

结论 从 GKRS 得出的有利结局可以成功地用于显微外科队列系列,以协助治疗建议。对于最大直径小于 2.5cm 的 bAVM 患者,在显微手术后 8 年,通过显微手术可以达到至少 90%的有利结局,如果没有深部静脉引流或功能区位置,所有直径的 Spetzler-Ponce A 级 bAVM 患者也可以达到这种有利结局。对于 B 级 bAVM 患者,只有在最大直径略高于 6cm 或更小,并且没有深部静脉引流或功能区位置的情况下,才能达到这种有利结局的比率。

相似文献

1
Microsurgery for Spetzler-Ponce Class A and B arteriovenous malformations utilizing an outcome score adopted from Gamma Knife radiosurgery: a prospective cohort study.采用伽玛刀放射外科采用的评分标准对 Spetzler-Ponce 分级 A 和 B 级动静脉畸形进行显微手术治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1105-1116. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS161275. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
Deliberate employment of postoperative hypotension for brain arteriovenous malformation surgery and the incidence of delayed postoperative hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.术后低血压在脑动静脉畸形手术中的故意应用与术后迟发性出血的发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1025-1040. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161333. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
3
Surgery for unruptured arteriovenous malformations of the brain is better than conservative management for selected cases: a prospective cohort study.对于某些特定病例,未破裂脑动静脉畸形的手术治疗优于保守治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Oct;121(4):878-90. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132691. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
Microsurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: subgroup outcomes in a consecutive series of 288 cases.脑动静脉畸形的显微手术治疗:288 例连续病例的亚组结果。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1056-1063. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS153017. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
5
Critical review of brain AVM surgery, surgical results and natural history in 2017.2017年脑动静脉畸形手术、手术结果及自然史的批判性综述。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Aug;159(8):1457-1478. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3217-x. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
Role of surgery in the management of brain arteriovenous malformations: prospective cohort study.手术在脑动静脉畸形治疗中的作用:前瞻性队列研究。
Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3549-55. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007206. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
International multicenter cohort study of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations. Part 2: Outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery.小儿脑动静脉畸形的国际多中心队列研究。第2部分:立体定向放射外科治疗后的结果。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Feb;19(2):136-148. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.PEDS16284. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
8
Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort.立体定向放射外科治疗脑动静脉畸形:多中心队列的长期疗效评估。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):36-44. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.JNS151311. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
Multimodality Management of Spetzler-Martin Grade 3 Brain Arteriovenous Malformations with Subgroup Analysis.Spetzler-Martin 3级脑动静脉畸形的多模态管理及亚组分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:263-274. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.046. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
10
A supplementary grading scale combining lesion-to-eloquence distance for predicting surgical outcomes of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations.一种结合病变与语言区距离的补充分级量表,用于预测脑动静脉畸形患者的手术结果。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):530-540. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161415. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of angiographic studies in patients diagnosed with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review.诊断为脑动静脉畸形患者的血管造影研究报告:一项系统评价
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 25;12:1252. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.139256.3. eCollection 2023.
2
Chinese Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery Society and Chinese Interventional & Hybrid Operation Society, of Chinese Stroke Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Eloquent Areas.中国脑血管神经外科学会和中国卒中协会中国介入与杂交手术学会:脑功能区动静脉畸形管理临床实践指南
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 9;12:651663. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.651663. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparing health-related quality of life in modified Rankin Scale grades: 15D results from 323 patients with brain arteriovenous malformation and population controls.
比较改良 Rankin 量表分级中的健康相关生活质量:323 例脑动静脉畸形患者和人群对照的 15D 结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jul;163(7):2037-2046. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04847-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
4
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline.《Stereotactic Radiosurgery 治疗 Spetzler-Martin 分级 I 和 II 级动静脉畸形:国际立体定向放射外科学会(ISRS)实践指南》。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):442-452. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa004.
5
The Application of the Novel Grading Scale (Lawton-Young Grading System) to Predict the Outcome of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation.新型分级量表(Lawton-Young 分级系统)在预测脑动静脉畸形转归中的应用。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 1;84(2):529-536. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy153.