Maldera A, De Marco P, Colombo P E, Origgi D, Torresin A
Medical Physics Dept, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162 Milano, Italy; Post Graduate School of Medical Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Physics Dept, Via Celoria, 16, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Medical Physics Dept, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milano, Italy; Post Graduate School of Medical Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Physics Dept, Via Celoria, 16, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Phys Med. 2017 Jan;33:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
The aim of this work was to evaluate how different acquisition geometries and reconstruction parameters affect the performance of four digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems (Senographe Essential - GE, Mammomat Inspiration - Siemens, Selenia Dimensions - Hologic and Amulet Innovality - Fujifilm) on the basis of a physical characterization. Average Glandular Dose (AGD) and image quality parameters such as in-plane/in-depth resolution, signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) and artefact spread function (ASF) were examined. Measured AGD values resulted below EUREF limits for 2D imaging. A large variability was recorded among the investigated systems: the mean dose ratio DBT/2D ranged between 1.1 and 1.9. In-plane resolution was in the range: 2.2mm-3.8mm in chest wall-nipple direction. A worse resolution was found for all devices in tube travel direction. In-depth resolution improved with increasing scan angle but was also affected by the choice of reconstruction and post-processing algorithms. The highest z-resolution was provided by Siemens (50°, FWHM=2.3mm) followed by GE (25°, FWHM=2.8mm), while the Fujifilm HR showed the lowest one, despite its wide scan angle (40°, FWHM=4.1mm). The ASF was dependent on scan angle: smaller range systems showed wider ASF curves; however a clear relationship was not found between scan angle and ASF, due to the different post processing and reconstruction algorithms. SDNR analysis, performed on Fujifilm system, demonstrated that pixel binning improves detectability for a fixed dose/projection. In conclusion, we provide a performance comparison among four DBT systems under a clinical acquisition mode.
这项工作的目的是在物理特性表征的基础上,评估不同的采集几何形状和重建参数如何影响四种数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)系统(GE公司的Senographe Essential、西门子公司的Mammomat Inspiration、Hologic公司的Selenia Dimensions和富士胶片公司的Amulet Innovality)的性能。研究了平均腺体剂量(AGD)以及诸如平面内/深度分辨率、信号差异噪声比(SDNR)和伪影扩散函数(ASF)等图像质量参数。测量得到的AGD值低于欧盟参考组织(EUREF)规定的二维成像限值。在所研究的系统之间记录到了很大的变异性:DBT/二维成像的平均剂量比在1.1至1.9之间。平面内分辨率在胸壁-乳头方向的范围为2.2毫米至3.8毫米。在所有设备的管移动方向上都发现分辨率较差。深度分辨率随着扫描角度的增加而提高,但也受到重建和后处理算法选择的影响。西门子公司提供了最高的z分辨率(50°,半高宽=2.3毫米),其次是GE公司(25°,半高宽=2.8毫米),而富士胶片公司的HR尽管扫描角度较宽(40°,半高宽=4.1毫米),但其z分辨率最低。ASF取决于扫描角度:范围较小的系统显示出较宽的ASF曲线;然而,由于不同的后处理和重建算法,在扫描角度和ASF之间未发现明确的关系。在富士胶片系统上进行的SDNR分析表明,对于固定剂量/投影,像素合并可提高可检测性。总之,我们在临床采集模式下对四种DBT系统进行了性能比较。