Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;64(5):565-571. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw839. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Intravenous colistin is difficult to use because plasma concentrations for antibacterial effect overlap those causing nephrotoxicity, and there is large inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics. The aim was to develop dosing algorithms for achievement of a clinically desirable average steady-state plasma colistin concentration (C) of 2mg/L.
Plasma concentration-time data from 214 adult critically-ill patients (creatinine clearance 0-236mL/min; 29 receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT)) were subjected to population pharmacokinetic analysis. Development of an algorithm for patients not receiving RRT was based upon the relationship between the dose of colistimethate that would be needed to achieve a desired C and creatinine clearance. The increase in colistin clearance when patients were on RRT was determined from the population analysis and guided the supplemental dosing needed. To balance potential antibacterial benefit against risk of nephrotoxicity the algorithms were designed to achieve target attainment rates of >80% for C ≥2 and <30% for C ≥4mg/L.
When algorithm doses were applied back to individual patients not on RRT (including patients prescribed intermittent dialysis on a non-dialysis day), >80% of patients with creatinine clearance <80mL/min achieved C ≥2mg/L; but for patients with creatinine clearance ≥80mL/min target attainment was <40%, even with the maximum allowed daily dose of 360mg colistin base activity. For patients receiving RRT, target attainment rates were >80% with the proposed supplemental dosing. In all categories of patients, <30% of patients attained C ≥4mg/L.
The project has generated clinician-friendly dosing algorithms and pointed to circumstances where intravenous monotherapy may be inadequate.
静脉注射黏菌素因抗菌作用的血浆浓度与引起肾毒性的浓度重叠,且药代动力学个体间差异较大,因此使用困难。目的是制定使临床理想的平均稳态血浆黏菌素浓度(C)达到 2mg/L 的给药方案。
对 214 例成人重症患者(肌酐清除率 0-236mL/min;29 例接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT))的血浆浓度-时间数据进行群体药代动力学分析。未接受 RRT 的患者的方案制定是基于达到期望 C 所需的黏菌素甲乙脂剂量与肌酐清除率之间的关系。从群体分析中确定当患者接受 RRT 时黏菌素清除率的增加,并指导所需的补充剂量。为了平衡潜在的抗菌益处和肾毒性风险,方案设计的目标是使 C ≥2 的达标率>80%,C ≥4mg/L 的达标率<30%。
当将算法剂量应用于未接受 RRT 的个体患者(包括在非透析日接受间歇性透析的患者)时,<80mL/min 肌酐清除率的患者中>80%达到 C ≥2mg/L;但对于肌酐清除率≥80mL/min 的患者,即使给予最大允许日剂量 360mg 黏菌素碱活性,达标率<40%。对于接受 RRT 的患者,建议的补充剂量使达标率>80%。在所有患者类别中,<30%的患者达到 C ≥4mg/L。
该项目生成了便于临床医生使用的给药方案,并指出了静脉单药治疗可能不足的情况。