Long Wen-Ming, Xu Wei-Xin, Hu Qin, Qu Qiang, Wu Xiao-Li, Chen Ying, Wan Qing, Xu Tian-Tian, Luo Yue, Qu Jian
Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Department of Pharmacy, The Second People's Hospital of Huaihua City (The Central Hospital of Huaihua City), Huaihua, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 31;16:1533952. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1533952. eCollection 2025.
() infections pose a critical clinical challenge. Although ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and polymyxin B (PMB) are frontline therapies, their comparative effectiveness in terms of 30-day survival, renal safety profiles, and clinical success rates remains poorly characterized. To address this knowledge gap, a multicenter real-world study was conducted.
-infected patients treated with PMB or CAZ/AVI-based regimens were enrolled from five hospitals between January 1, 2021, to July 31, 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate efficacy and acute renal injury (AKI) occurrence, and a multivariable COX proportional hazards regression of the 30-day all-cause mortality was performed.
170 -infected patients were enrolled, among whom 124 (72.9%) had d infections and 77 (45.3%) received CAZ/AVI-based regimens. After 1:1 PSM, the results demonstrated that the clearance rate was significantly higher in the CAZ/AVI group compared to the PMB group (61.0% vs. 24.4%, = 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in clinical success rates (55.6% vs. 44.4%), incidence of AKI (26.8% vs. 39.0%), or 30-day all-cause mortality (7.3% vs. 12.2%) between the two groups (all > 0.05). Compared with the PMB-based regimens, CAZ/AVI-based regimens were significantly associated with clearance success (OR 0.185, 95%CI 0.061-0.564, < 0.001); additionally, multi-site infection (OR 0.295, 95%CI 0.097-0.899, = 0.032) and the number of combined anti- antibiotics (OR 0.435, 95%CI 0.213-0.888, = 0.022) were associated with enhanced clearance. The occurrence of AKI in patients with infection was associated with underlying diseases, including sepsis/septic shock (OR 3.405, 95%CI 1.007-11.520, = 0.049), and diabetes mellitus (OR 3.600, 95%CI 1.018-12.733, = 0.047). In addition, other infection (HR 40.849, 95%CI 3.323-502.170, = 0.004), APACHE II score (HR 1.072, 95%CI 1.032-1.114, < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality.
In conclusion, CAZ/AVI-based regimens demonstrated superior efficacy in clearing compared to PMB-based regimens. Furthermore, several factors associated with AKI and mortality in -infected patients were identified, highlighting the need for further research to optimize treatment strategies.
()感染带来了严峻的临床挑战。尽管头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ/AVI)和多粘菌素B(PMB)是一线治疗方法,但它们在30天生存率、肾脏安全性和临床成功率方面的相对有效性仍缺乏充分描述。为填补这一知识空白,开展了一项多中心真实世界研究。
2021年1月1日至2023年7月31日期间,从五家医院招募接受基于PMB或CAZ/AVI方案治疗的()感染患者。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)和二元逻辑回归分析以评估疗效和急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生情况,并对30天全因死亡率进行多变量COX比例风险回归分析。
共纳入170例()感染患者,其中124例(72.9%)患有()感染,77例(45.3%)接受基于CAZ/AVI的方案治疗。经过1:1的PSM后,结果显示CAZ/AVI组的()清除率显著高于PMB组(61.0%对24.4%,P = 0.001);然而,两组在临床成功率(55.6%对44.4%)、AKI发生率(26.8%对39.0%)或30天全因死亡率(7.3%对12.2%)方面均未观察到显著差异(均P>0.05)。与基于PMB的方案相比,基于CAZ/AVI的方案与()清除成功显著相关(OR 0.185,95%CI 0.061 - 0.564,P<0.001);此外,多部位感染(OR 0.295,95%CI 0.097 - 0.899,P = 0.032)和联合使用抗()抗生素的数量(OR 0.435,95%CI 0.213 - 0.888,P = 0.022)与()清除增强相关。()感染患者中AKI的发生与潜在疾病相关,包括脓毒症/脓毒性休克(OR 3.405,95%CI 1.007 - 11.520,P = 0.049)和糖尿病(OR 3.600,95%CI 1.018 - 12.733,P = 0.047)。此外,其他()感染(HR 40.849,95%CI 3.323 - 502.170,P = 0.004)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分(HR 1.072,95%CI 1.032 - 1.114,P<0.001)被发现是30天全因死亡率的独立预测因素。
总之,与基于PMB的方案相比,基于CAZ/AVI的方案在清除()方面显示出更高的疗效。此外,确定了()感染患者中与AKI和死亡率相关的几个因素,突出了进一步研究以优化治疗策略的必要性。