• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乙酰胆碱激发试验诱发左冠状动脉痉挛时血管舒缩类型对预后的影响。

Impact of vasomotion type on prognosis of coronary artery spasm induced by acetylcholine provocation test of left coronary artery.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 435-040, Republic of Korea.

Future Convergence Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 136-791, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2017 Feb;257:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.09.015
PMID:28012648
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The impact of vasomotion types on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery spasm (CAS) induced by the acetylcholine provocation test (ACH-test) remains unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated 4644 consecutive patients with typical resting chest pain (CP), but no angiographically significant coronary artery lesion (<50% stenosis), who underwent an ACH-test. According to their vasomotor response, patients were categorized into four types: normal vasomotion (no CP, no ischemic electrocardiographic changes, and no vasoconstriction), microvascular spasm (CP with <75% vasoconstriction but with CP relief after nitroglycerin infusion), epicardial spasm (CP with ≥75% vasoconstriction), and ACH-test inconclusive (vasoconstriction and/or electrocardiographic changes, but no CP). We investigated CP recurrence requiring follow-up angiography and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during 5 years.

RESULTS

CP recurred in 7.9% of patients and was more frequent in abnormal vasomotion types (normal vasomotion, microvascular spasm, epicardial spasm, and inconclusive type: 5.4%, 9.8%, 10.9%, and 8.2%, respectively, log-rank p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis adjusted for medication use after the ACH-test, vasomotion subtype was not an independent predictor, whereas male sex, fixed lesion on baseline angiography, and medications including calcium channel blockers (CCBs), nitrates, and statins were independent positive predictors for recurrent CP. Alcohol consumption at the initial interview was a negative predictor. MACEs were observed in 1.6%, and the incidence was similar among subtypes (p = 0.421).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent CP and long-term outcomes are independent of vasomotion subtypes, but long-term use of CCBs, nitrates, and statins is a significant predictor for recurrent CP.

摘要

背景与目的

乙酰胆碱激发试验(ACH 试验)诱发的冠状动脉痉挛(CAS)患者中,血管舒缩类型对长期临床结局的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们评估了 4644 例连续的有典型静息性胸痛(CP)但无血管造影意义的冠状动脉病变(<50%狭窄)的患者,这些患者均接受了 ACH 试验。根据他们的血管舒缩反应,患者被分为四种类型:正常血管舒缩(无 CP、无缺血性心电图改变和无血管收缩)、微血管痉挛(CP 伴有<75%血管收缩,但在硝酸甘油输注后 CP 缓解)、心外膜痉挛(CP 伴有≥75%血管收缩)和 ACH 试验不确定(血管收缩和/或心电图改变,但无 CP)。我们研究了需要随访血管造影的 CP 复发和 5 年内主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)。

结果

CP 复发率为 7.9%,在异常血管舒缩类型中更为常见(正常血管舒缩、微血管痉挛、心外膜痉挛和不确定类型的 CP 复发率分别为 5.4%、9.8%、10.9%和 8.2%,log-rank p=0.009)。在调整 ACH 试验后药物使用的多变量分析中,血管舒缩亚型不是独立的预测因素,而男性、基线血管造影上的固定病变以及包括钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、硝酸盐和他汀类药物在内的药物是 CP 复发的独立阳性预测因素。初次访谈时饮酒是 CP 复发的阴性预测因素。MACEs发生率为 1.6%,各亚型之间的发生率相似(p=0.421)。

结论

CP 复发和长期结局与血管舒缩亚型无关,但长期使用 CCB、硝酸盐和他汀类药物是 CP 复发的显著预测因素。

相似文献

1
Impact of vasomotion type on prognosis of coronary artery spasm induced by acetylcholine provocation test of left coronary artery.乙酰胆碱激发试验诱发左冠状动脉痉挛时血管舒缩类型对预后的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2017 Feb;257:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
2
Impact of alcohol drinking on acetylcholine-induced coronary artery spasm in Korean populations.饮酒对韩国人群乙酰胆碱诱导的冠状动脉痉挛的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Jan;268:163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
Moderate vasomotor response to acetylcholine provocation test as an indicator of long-term prognosis.乙酰胆碱激发试验的中度血管运动反应作为长期预后的指标。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Dec;31(12):1943-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0827-9. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
4
Coronary vasomotor response to intracoronary acetylcholine injection, clinical features, and long-term prognosis in 873 consecutive patients with coronary spasm: analysis of a single-center study over 20 years.冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱注射后血管舒缩反应、临床特征及 873 例冠状动脉痉挛患者的长期预后:单中心 20 年研究分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Jul 15;2(4):e000227. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000227.
5
Five-year major clinical outcomes according to severity of coronary artery spasm as assessed by intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test.根据冠状动脉乙酰胆碱激发试验评估的冠状动脉痉挛严重程度的 5 年主要临床结局。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;111(3):144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
The impact of myocardial bridge on coronary artery spasm and long-term clinical outcomes in patients without significant atherosclerotic stenosis.心肌桥对无明显动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者冠状动脉痉挛和长期临床结局的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Mar;270:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
7
The 24-Month Prognosis of Patients With Positive or Intermediate Results in the Intracoronary Ergonovine Provocation Test.冠状动脉内麦角新碱激发试验阳性或中间结果患者的 24 个月预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(7):914-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.249. Epub 2015 May 20.
8
Safety and optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm.用于诊断多支血管冠状动脉痉挛的激发试验的安全性及最佳方案。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Feb;31(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0591-7. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
9
Predictive value of coronary artery dilation response to nitrate for a positive intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test.冠状动脉对硝酸盐扩张反应对冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验阳性的预测价值。
Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Nov;27(7):551-5. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000401.
10
Sequential spasm provocation tests might overcome a limitation of the standard spasm provocation tests.序贯性痉挛激发试验可能会克服标准痉挛激发试验的一个局限性。
Coron Artery Dis. 2015 Sep;26(6):490-4. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000267.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Spasm Testing with Acetylcholine: A Powerful Tool for a Personalized Therapy of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders.乙酰胆碱激发试验:冠状动脉痉挛检测——冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍个体化治疗的有力工具
Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;14(3):292. doi: 10.3390/life14030292.
2
Post-spastic flow recovery time to document vasospasm induced ischemia during acetylcholine provocation testing.记录乙酰胆碱激发试验期间血管痉挛性缺血的痉挛后血流恢复时间。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 May 30;47:101220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101220. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Clinical Outcomes and Provoked Epicardial Spasm Phenotypes via Intracoronary Acetylcholine Testing in 680 Patients with Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.
680例心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉患者经冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱试验的临床结局及诱发的心外膜痉挛表型
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;12(10):1465. doi: 10.3390/life12101465.
4
Sex Difference in Coronary Artery Spasm Tested by Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Test in Patients with Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者经冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验检测到的冠状动脉痉挛中的性别差异。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Sep 9;2022:5289776. doi: 10.1155/2022/5289776. eCollection 2022.
5
Haemodynamic characterisation of different endotypes in coronary artery vasospasm in reaction to acetylcholine.乙酰胆碱激发下冠状动脉痉挛不同内型的血流动力学特征
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Aug 13;42:101105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101105. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic correlates of epicardial and microvascular spasm in patients with myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries.心肌缺血和非阻塞性冠状动脉患者心外膜和微血管痉挛的临床、血管造影和超声心动图相关性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Apr;109(4):435-443. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01523-w. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
The multi-vessel and diffuse coronary spasm is a risk factor for persistent angina in patients received anti-angina medication.多支冠状动脉弥漫性痉挛是接受抗心绞痛药物治疗的患者发生持续性心绞痛的一个危险因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(47):e13288. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013288.