Gerlach Lauren B, Kales Helen C, Maust Donovan T, Chiang Claire, Stano Claire, Choe Hae Mi, Zivin Kara
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;25(4):407-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
In 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety announcement cautioning providers against prescribing citalopram above 40 mg per day given concerns for QT prolongation. We assessed the impact of a health system quality improvement initiative to identify patients taking higher than the recommended dose of citalopram.
Retrospective cohort study.
Nine primary care clinics within the University of Michigan from March 2012 to February 2013.
Adult patients taking a higher-than-recommended dose of citalopram following the FDA warning in 2011 (N = 199).
Frequency of EKG monitoring, clinical factors associated with patients whose citalopram dose or use was adjusted, and potential impact of these changes on overall health care utilization was assessed.
In patients prescribed higher-than-recommended doses of citalopram and who received a note from a pharmacist regarding the FDA warnings, only 8.5% received electrocardiogram (EKG) monitoring. Patients who were converted to an alternative antidepressant from citalopram were more likely to receive subsequent new prescriptions for benzodiazepines and sedative hypnotics (χ = 7.9, p = 0.048). Patients who had any adjustments to their antidepressant medication had greater overall health care utilization (OR: 25.0; 95% CI: 5.7-109.6; p < 0.001) than patients remaining on the same dose of citalopram.
Despite a targeted quality intervention to address the FDA warning regarding citalopram, the warning was associated with low levels of EKG monitoring, increased anxiolytic and sedative medication use, and higher healthcare utilization. This finding may represent destabilization of patients on previously therapeutic doses of their antidepressant and an unintended consequence of the FDA warning.
2011年,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了一项安全公告,鉴于对QT间期延长的担忧,告诫医疗服务提供者不要开具每日剂量超过40毫克的西酞普兰处方。我们评估了一项医疗系统质量改进举措对识别服用高于推荐剂量西酞普兰患者的影响。
回顾性队列研究。
2012年3月至2013年2月期间密歇根大学的9家初级保健诊所。
2011年FDA发出警告后服用高于推荐剂量西酞普兰的成年患者(N = 199)。
评估心电图(EKG)监测的频率、与西酞普兰剂量或使用情况被调整的患者相关的临床因素,以及这些变化对整体医疗保健利用的潜在影响。
在被开具高于推荐剂量西酞普兰且收到药剂师关于FDA警告通知的患者中,只有8.5%接受了心电图(EKG)监测。从西酞普兰转换为其他抗抑郁药的患者更有可能随后收到苯二氮䓬类药物和镇静催眠药的新处方(χ = 7.9,p = 0.048)。与继续服用相同剂量西酞普兰的患者相比,对抗抑郁药物进行任何调整的患者整体医疗保健利用率更高(比值比:25.0;95%置信区间:5.7 - 109.6;p < 0.001)。
尽管针对FDA关于西酞普兰的警告进行了有针对性的质量干预,但该警告与低水平的EKG监测、抗焦虑和镇静药物使用增加以及更高的医疗保健利用率相关。这一发现可能代表了服用先前治疗剂量抗抑郁药的患者病情不稳定,以及FDA警告带来的意外后果。