Jung Ah Ra, Koh Tae Kyung, Kim Su Jin, Lee Kun Hee, Cho Joong Saeng, Kim Sung Wan
Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Oct;44(5):571-575. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
This study aimed to compare and analyze the level and degree of observed upper airway obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using Müller's maneuver (MM) and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). We sought to find a method for evaluating the upper airway that could be used to determine surgical sites.
This study included 80 OSA patients who visited Kyung Hee Medical Center and underwent polysomnography (PSG) from March 2013 to March 2014. Obstructive levels observed by MM were classified into retropalatal level, or the lateral wall and retroglossal level. These levels were compared with those determined by DISE through the VOTE classification.
Based on the results of MM and DISE, lateral wall and retropalatal level obstructions showed relatively high conformity, while retroglossal level obstruction exhibited considerable differences. When evaluated at each level, patients with obstruction on MM also showed partial or complete obstruction on DISE at same level, and patients with no obstruction on DISE also showed no obstruction on MM at same level.
Both examination methods revealed the same obstruction levels in all cases except epiglottic level, but there were some differences in obstructive degree. MM is capable of detecting obstruction levels in the upper airway and can be used to determine surgical sites in cases when DISE cannot be used due to a patient's condition or a clinic's circumstances.
本研究旨在比较和分析使用米勒动作(MM)和药物诱导睡眠内镜检查(DISE)的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者上气道阻塞的观察水平和程度。我们试图找到一种评估上气道的方法,可用于确定手术部位。
本研究纳入了2013年3月至2014年3月期间就诊于庆熙医疗中心并接受多导睡眠图(PSG)检查的80例OSA患者。通过MM观察到的阻塞水平分为腭后水平、侧壁水平和舌后水平。这些水平通过VOTE分类法与DISE确定的水平进行比较。
根据MM和DISE的结果,侧壁和腭后水平阻塞显示出相对较高的一致性,而舌后水平阻塞则存在显著差异。在每个水平进行评估时,MM上有阻塞的患者在DISE上同一水平也显示部分或完全阻塞,DISE上无阻塞的患者在MM上同一水平也无阻塞。
除会厌水平外,两种检查方法在所有病例中均显示相同的阻塞水平,但阻塞程度存在一些差异。MM能够检测上气道的阻塞水平,并且在由于患者病情或临床情况无法使用DISE时,可用于确定手术部位。