Bascans Jean-Marc, Courbage Christophe, Oros Cornel
University of Poitiers, CRIEF, 2, Rue Jean Carbonnier, 86022, Poitiers, France.
Haute Ecole de Gestion de Genève, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Rue de la Tambourine 17, 1227, Carouge, Switzerland.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Dec 24. doi: 10.1007/s10754-016-9206-4.
This paper investigates theoretically how the structure of means-tested public long-term care (LTC) support influences the relationship between LTC insurance and informal care. Three types of public support encountered in various means-tested LTC schemes are examined. First, the level to be considered for means-testing only takes into account the level of wealth of the recipient without considering the cost of LTC or the possible insurance benefits. Second, the public support also considers the LTC needs of the recipient. Third, the means-test structure takes into consideration insurance benefits as well. Our results show that the optimal levels of insurance and informal care as well as their relationship are strongly influenced by the ways means-tested public support for LTC is structured, which have important implications in terms of public policy for the financing of LTC needs.
本文从理论上研究了经济状况调查型公共长期护理(LTC)支持的结构如何影响长期护理保险与非正式护理之间的关系。考察了在各种经济状况调查型长期护理计划中遇到的三种公共支持类型。首先,经济状况调查所考虑的水平仅考虑受助者的财富水平,而不考虑长期护理成本或可能的保险福利。其次,公共支持还考虑受助者的长期护理需求。第三,经济状况调查结构也考虑保险福利。我们的结果表明,保险和非正式护理的最优水平及其关系受到经济状况调查型公共长期护理支持的构建方式的强烈影响,这对长期护理需求融资的公共政策具有重要意义。