• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估骨质疏松症和骨折风险评估工具(国际骨质疏松基金会一分钟测试、SCORE和FRAX)在绝经后巴勒斯坦妇女中的有效性。

Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF One Minute Test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women.

作者信息

Kharroubi Akram, Saba Elias, Ghannam Ibrahim, Darwish Hisham

机构信息

Faculty of Health Professions, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Palestinian Osteoporosis Prevention Society [POPS], Bethlehem, Palestine.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0298-8. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-016-0298-8
PMID:28013446
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The need for simple self-assessment tools is necessary to predict women at high risk for developing osteoporosis. In this study, tools like the IOF One Minute Test, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), and Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) were found to be valid for Palestinian women. The threshold for predicting women at risk for each tool was estimated.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of the updated IOF (International Osteoporosis Foundation) One Minute Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Test, FRAX, SCORE as well as age alone to detect the risk of developing osteoporosis in postmenopausal Palestinian women.

METHODS

Three hundred eighty-two women 45 years and older were recruited including 131 women with osteoporosis and 251 controls following bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, 287 completed questionnaires of the different risk assessment tools. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated for each tool using bone BMD as the gold standard for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was the highest for FRAX calculated with BMD for predicting hip fractures (0.897) followed by FRAX for major fractures (0.826) with cut-off values ˃1.5 and ˃7.8%, respectively. The IOF One Minute Test AUC (0.629) was the lowest compared to other tested tools but with sufficient accuracy for predicting the risk of developing osteoporosis with a cut-off value ˃4 total yes questions out of 18. SCORE test and age alone were also as good predictors of risk for developing osteoporosis. According to the ROC curve for age, women ≥64 years had a higher risk of developing osteoporosis. Higher percentage of women with low BMD (T-score ≤-1.5) or osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5) was found among women who were not exposed to the sun, who had menopause before the age of 45 years, or had lower body mass index (BMI) compared to controls. Women who often fall had lower BMI and approximately 27% of the recruited postmenopausal Palestinian women had accidents that caused fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple self-assessment tools like FRAX without BMD, SCORE, and the IOF One Minute Tests were valid for predicting Palestinian postmenopausal women at high risk of developing osteoporosis.

摘要

未标注

需要简单的自我评估工具来预测有患骨质疏松症高风险的女性。在本研究中,国际骨质疏松症基金会(IOF)一分钟测试、骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)和简易计算骨质疏松症风险评估(SCORE)等工具被发现对巴勒斯坦女性有效。估算了每种工具预测有风险女性的阈值。

目的

本研究的目的是评估更新后的国际骨质疏松症基金会(IOF)一分钟骨质疏松症风险评估测试、FRAX、SCORE以及仅年龄因素检测绝经后巴勒斯坦女性患骨质疏松症风险的有效性。

方法

招募了382名45岁及以上的女性,包括131名骨质疏松症女性和251名对照,进行骨密度(BMD)测量,287人完成了不同风险评估工具的问卷调查。以骨密度作为骨质疏松症的金标准,对每种工具评估受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

用骨密度计算的FRAX预测髋部骨折的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)最高(0.897),其次是预测主要骨折的FRAX(0.826),截断值分别为>1.5%和>7.8%。与其他测试工具相比,IOF一分钟测试的AUC(0.629)最低,但预测患骨质疏松症风险的准确性足够,截断值为18个问题中肯定回答总数>4个。SCORE测试和仅年龄因素也是患骨质疏松症风险的良好预测指标。根据年龄的ROC曲线,≥64岁的女性患骨质疏松症的风险更高。与对照组相比,未暴露于阳光下、45岁前绝经或体重指数(BMI)较低的女性中,骨密度低(T值≤-1.5)或患骨质疏松症(T值≤-2.5)的女性比例更高。经常跌倒的女性BMI较低,约27%的招募的绝经后巴勒斯坦女性发生过导致骨折的意外事故。

结论

像不依赖骨密度的FRAX、SCORE和IOF一分钟测试这样的简单自我评估工具对预测有患骨质疏松症高风险的绝经后巴勒斯坦女性是有效的。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF One Minute Test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women.评估骨质疏松症和骨折风险评估工具(国际骨质疏松基金会一分钟测试、SCORE和FRAX)在绝经后巴勒斯坦妇女中的有效性。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0298-8. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
2
Setting the new FRAX reference threshold without bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal women.在中国绝经后妇女中设定新的 FRAX 参考阈值而不考虑骨密度。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2021 Feb;44(2):347-352. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01315-4. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.在巴西绝经后女性中,使用FRAX计算的骨质疏松性骨折风险在纳入和未纳入骨密度测量数据时的相关性。
Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11:16. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0255-y. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.三种用于识别中国老年男性疼痛性新发骨质疏松性椎体骨折工具的验证:骨密度、亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具和骨折风险评估工具。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Apr 22;11:461-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S101078. eCollection 2016.
5
Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool.基于 BMD 和临床危险因素预测绝经早期妇女骨折风险:WHO FRAX 工具的敏感性。
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 May;25(5):1002-9. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.12.
6
Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.西班牙FRAX模型在预测骨质疏松性骨折决策中的原理:西班牙女性FRIDEX队列的更新
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 17;17:262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6.
7
Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)与日本中老年女性骨质疏松症的诊断:千叶骨调查
Endocr J. 2018 Feb 26;65(2):193-202. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0331. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
8
Comparison of trabecular bone score and hip structural analysis with FRAX in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病绝经后女性中骨小梁评分和髋部结构分析与FRAX的比较
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):951-957. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0634-2. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
9
FRAX® with or without BMD and TBS predicts fragility fractures in community-dwelling rural southern Indian postmenopausal women.FRAX®(骨密度仪)结合或不结合 BMD(骨密度)和 TBS(骨小梁评分)可预测居住在乡村的社区中的印度南部绝经后女性的脆性骨折。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jun 1;15(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00756-x.
10
[Risk factors for bone mineral density changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fracture risk assessment].[类风湿关节炎患者骨密度变化的危险因素及骨折风险评估]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Oct 18;47(5):781-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a novel prediction model for osteoporosis : from serotonin to fat-soluble vitamins.一种新型骨质疏松症预测模型的开发与验证:从血清素到脂溶性维生素
Bone Joint Res. 2025 Feb 18;14(2):111-123. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.142.BJR-2023-0409.R2.
2
Association between dietary zinc intake amount and prevalence of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly individuals: a cross-sectional study.中老年人群膳食锌摄入量与骨质疏松症患病率的关联:一项横断面研究
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;194(2):553-562. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03910-x. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
亚洲人群骨折风险评估工具的鉴别准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Bone Metab. 2024 Nov;31(4):296-315. doi: 10.11005/jbm.24.781. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
4
The correlation between traditional Chinese medicine constitution and primary osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中医体质与原发性骨质疏松症的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e39560. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039560.
5
Construction of a predictive model for osteoporosis risk in men: using the IOF 1-min osteoporosis test.构建男性骨质疏松风险预测模型:使用国际骨质疏松基金会 1 分钟骨质疏松症测试。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 11;18(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04266-7.
6
Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.执行摘要:意大利 2021 年脆性骨折的诊断、风险分层和护理连续性指南。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 18;14:1137671. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671. eCollection 2023.
7
A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS.一项关于骨折风险评估工具(FRAX、DeFRA、FRA-HS)性能的系统评价。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2023 Nov;46(11):2287-2297. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
8
Risk of primary osteoporosis score (RPOPs): an algorithm model for primary osteoporosis risk assessment in grass-roots hospital.原发性骨质疏松风险评分(RPOPs):基层医院原发性骨质疏松风险评估的算法模型。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 1;23(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06014-0.
9
Osteoporosis and Related Health Status Among the Elderly Urban Residents in Elderly-Care Inns in Beijing, a Multicenter DXA Survey.北京老年护理院老年城市居民骨质疏松症及相关健康状况:一项多中心双能X线吸收法调查
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 22;13:875678. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.875678. eCollection 2022.
10
New Model for Osteoporosis Risk Screening Using Emergency Department Visits.利用急诊科就诊情况进行骨质疏松症风险筛查的新模型
Cureus. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):e22237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22237. eCollection 2022 Feb.