Comparison of stent versus medical therapy for symptomatic patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of intracranial stent implantation and medical therapy for treatment of severe intracranial stenosis.

METHODS

Articles were identified from Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar published up to August 25, 2016. Eligible studies reported stroke occurrence, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and event-free survival rates in patients who suffered recent TIA or stroke caused by stenosis of a major intracranial artery and treated with either medical therapy or stenting. 4 studies enrolled a total 739 patients.

RESULTS

While no association between intracranial endovascular therapy and short-term stroke risk was found (pooled OR=1.349, 95% CI=0.541 to 3.367, P=0.521), significantly higher rate of stroke occurrence was observed in patients treated with stent therapy within 30days of treatment (pooled OR=3.143, 95% CI=1.755 to 5.628, P<0.001). No association was found between the type of treatment and TIA occurrence (pooled OR=0.702, 95% CI=0.277 to 1.781, P=0.457) and event-free survival rate (pooled HR=1.170, 95% CI=0.947 to 1.447, P=0.145).

CONCLUSION

Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stent therapy may have higher risk of short-term stroke.