Romero Philipp, Nickel Felix, Mantel Maisha, Frongia Giovanni, Rossler Alina, Kowalewski Karl-Friedrich, Müller-Stich Beat Peter, Günther Patrick
Division of Paediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Apr;52(4):633-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.11.049. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
Intracorporal knot tying (ICKT) and suturing in minimal invasive surgery (MIS) represent a key skill for advanced procedures such as Nissen fundoplication. Suture placement under tension is particularly challenging during MIS. The aim of this study was to compare ICKT of the common surgical square knot and the slipping knot on a simulated suture placement under tension. Furthermore, we objectively assessed the surgical skill of ICKT following 3hours of hands-on training.
A box trainer was used for laparoscopic knot tying with predefined openings. A 12cm suture was placed in central view. We used a standardized silicon suture pad with a defined wound dehiscence of 0.5cm and marked needle entrance and exit targets next to the incision. Twenty participants were divided among three groups in this study. The first group (n=5) consisted of senior physicians. The second group (n=5) was made up of surgical residents in the first to fourth year of residency training. The third group (n=10) contained medical students between their third and sixth year of study without any prior experience in laparoscopic surgery. Residents and students received a 3-hour hands-on training in surgical square and slipping knot tying. Each participant tied two of each knot types before and after the hands-on training. Knot quality, performance, total time and suture placement accuracy were the parameters for assessment in this study.
The knot quality was greater for the slipping knot compared with the square knot in all groups. There were no significant intragroup differences in knot tying performance, task time and accuracy of both suture methods. Students and residents improved in all categories for both ICKT techniques after training.
We compared ICKT of the surgical square knot with the slipping knot on a simulated suture placement under tension during a standardized training program for medical students and surgical residents. In our study, the average quality of the slipping knot was significantly superior to the square knot in all participants. The knot tying performance, task time, and accuracy of students and residents after hands-on training were not significantly different between both suture methods. This suggests that the two ICKT techniques have similar properties except the quality advantages of the slipping knot. Although students and residents improved in all categories for both ICKT techniques after training, they did not achieve expert level for task times and accuracy.
In this pilot trail, the quality of the slipping knot was superior to the surgical square knot during intracorporal suturing under tension. Our 3-hour sequential training program improved laparoscopic suturing and knot tying skills in all participants. Our findings suggest that training centers for MIS using validated training programs should be a continuous and integral part of surgical education.
USPSTF Level III: monocentric, prospective, pilot Trial.
体内打结(ICKT)和微创手术(MIS)中的缝合是诸如尼氏胃底折叠术等高级手术的一项关键技能。在微创手术中,在张力下放置缝线尤其具有挑战性。本研究的目的是在模拟的张力下缝线放置过程中比较普通手术方结和滑结的体内打结情况。此外,我们对手工训练3小时后的体内打结手术技巧进行了客观评估。
使用一个带有预定义开口的箱式训练器进行腹腔镜打结。将一根12厘米的缝线置于中心视野。我们使用了一个标准化的硅胶缝线垫,其具有0.5厘米的明确伤口裂开,并在切口旁标记了针的进出目标。本研究中20名参与者被分为三组。第一组(n = 5)由资深医生组成。第二组(n = 5)由住院医师培训第一年至第四年的外科住院医师组成。第三组(n = 10)包含医学三年级至六年级且此前无腹腔镜手术经验的医学生。住院医师和学生接受了3小时的手术方结和滑结打结的实践培训。每位参与者在实践培训前后各打两种结。结的质量、操作表现、总时间和缝线放置准确性是本研究中的评估参数。
在所有组中,滑结的结质量均优于方结。两种缝线方法在打结操作表现、任务时间和准确性方面,组内均无显著差异。培训后,学生和住院医师在两种体内打结技术的所有类别中均有提高。
在为医学生和外科住院医师开展的标准化培训项目中,我们在模拟的张力下缝线放置过程中比较了手术方结和滑结的体内打结情况。在我们的研究中,所有参与者中滑结的平均质量显著优于方结。实践培训后,学生和住院医师在两种缝线方法的打结操作表现、任务时间和准确性方面无显著差异。这表明除了滑结的质量优势外,两种体内打结技术具有相似的特性。尽管培训后学生和住院医师在两种体内打结技术的所有类别中均有提高,但他们在任务时间和准确性方面未达到专家水平。
在这项初步试验中,在张力下体内缝合时滑结的质量优于手术方结。我们的3小时连续培训项目提高了所有参与者的腹腔镜缝合和打结技能。我们的研究结果表明,使用经过验证的培训项目的微创手术培训中心应成为外科教育的持续且不可或缺的一部分。
美国预防医学工作组III级:单中心、前瞻性、初步试验。