Hendrie Jonathan D, Nickel Felix, Bruckner Thomas, Kowalewski Karl-Friedrich, Garrow Carly R, Mantel Maisha, Romero Philipp, Müller-Stich Beat P
Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Trials. 2016 Jan 7;17:14. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1145-8.
Laparoscopy training has become an integral part of surgical education. Suturing and knot tying is a basic, yet inherent part of many laparoscopic operations, and should be mastered prior to operating on patients. One common and standardized suturing technique is the C-loop technique. In the standard training setting, on a box trainer, the trainee learns the psychomotor movements of the task and the laparoscopic visuospatial orientation simultaneously. Learning the psychomotor and visuospatial skills separately and sequentially may offer a more time-efficient alternative to the current standard of training.
This is a monocentric, two-arm randomized controlled trial. The participants are medical students in their clinical years (third to sixth year) at Heidelberg University who have not previously partaken in a laparoscopic training course lasting more than 2 hours. A total of 54 students are randomized into one of two arms in a 1:1 ratio to sequential learning (group 1) or control (group 2). Both groups receive a standardized introduction to the training center, laparoscopic instruments, and C-loop technique. Group 1 learn the C-loop using a transparent shoebox, thus only learning the psychomotor skills. Once they reach proficiency, they then perform the same knot tying procedure on a box trainer with standard laparoscopic view, where they combine their psychomotor skills with the visuospatial orientation inherent to laparoscopy. Group 2 learn the C-loop using solely a box trainer with standard laparoscopic view until they reach proficiency. Trainees work in pairs and time is recorded for each attempt. The primary outcome is mean total training time for each group. Secondary endpoints include procedural and knot quality subscore differences. Tertiary endpoints include studying the influence of gender and video game experience on performance.
This study addresses whether the learning of the psychomotor and visuospatial aspects of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying is optimal sequentially or simultaneously, by assessing total training time, procedural, and knot quality differences between the two groups. It will improve the efficiency of future laparoscopic suturing courses and may serve as an indicator for laparoscopic training in a broader context, i.e., not only for suturing and knot tying.
This trial was registered on 12 August 2015 with the trial registration number DRKS00008668 .
腹腔镜培训已成为外科教育不可或缺的一部分。缝合和打结是许多腹腔镜手术的基本且内在的部分,在对患者进行手术之前应掌握。一种常见的标准化缝合技术是C环技术。在标准培训环境中,在箱式训练器上,学员同时学习该任务的心理运动动作和腹腔镜视觉空间定向。分别且按顺序学习心理运动和视觉空间技能可能会提供一种比当前标准培训更节省时间的选择。
这是一项单中心、双臂随机对照试验。参与者是海德堡大学临床年级(三年级至六年级)的医学生,他们之前未参加过持续时间超过2小时的腹腔镜培训课程。总共54名学生以1:1的比例随机分为两组,分别接受顺序学习(第1组)或对照(第2组)。两组都接受关于培训中心、腹腔镜器械和C环技术的标准化介绍。第1组使用透明鞋盒学习C环技术,从而只学习心理运动技能。一旦他们达到熟练程度,然后在具有标准腹腔镜视野的箱式训练器上进行相同的打结操作,在那里他们将心理运动技能与腹腔镜固有的视觉空间定向相结合。第2组仅使用具有标准腹腔镜视野的箱式训练器学习C环技术,直到他们达到熟练程度。学员两人一组进行操作,并记录每次尝试的时间。主要结局是每组的平均总训练时间。次要终点包括操作和打结质量子评分差异。三级终点包括研究性别和电子游戏经验对操作表现的影响。
本研究通过评估两组之间的总训练时间、操作和打结质量差异,探讨腹腔镜缝合和打结的心理运动和视觉空间方面的学习是按顺序进行还是同时进行更为理想。它将提高未来腹腔镜缝合课程的效率,并可能在更广泛的背景下作为腹腔镜培训的一个指标,即不仅适用于缝合和打结。
本试验于2015年8月12日注册,试验注册号为DRKS00008668。