Suppr超能文献

帕金森病中的再发性震颤:临床及加速度计特性

Re-emergent tremor in Parkinson's disease: Clinical and accelerometric properties.

作者信息

Aytürk Zübeyde, Yilmaz Rezzak, Akbostanci M Cenk

机构信息

Turgut Özal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Neurodegeneration, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (HIH), University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Mar;37:31-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Abstract

Re-emergent tremor (RET) and the classical parkinsonian rest tremor were considered as two different phenomena of the same central tremor circuit. However, clinical and accelerometric characteristics of these tremors were not previously compared in a single study. We evaluated disease characteristics and accelerometric measurements of two tremor types in 42 patients with Parkinson's disease. Disease specific features and accelerometric measurements of peak frequency, amplitude at peak frequency and the root mean square (RMS) amplitude of two tremor types were compared. Eighteen patients had RET and the mean latency of the RET was 9.48 (±9.2)s. Groups of only rest tremor and RET did not differ significantly in age of disease onset, disease duration and severity and mean levodopa equivalent dose. Comparison of peak frequency and amplitude at peak frequency were not different between the groups, but RMS amplitude was significantly higher in the RET group (p=0.03). RMS amplitude of RET was also correlated with disease severity (r=.48, p=0.04). These results support the previous notion that rest tremor and RET are analogue, both are triggered by the same central ossilator with RET being only the suppression of the rest tremor due to arm repositioning.

摘要

再发性震颤(RET)和经典的帕金森静止性震颤被认为是同一中枢震颤环路的两种不同现象。然而,此前尚未在一项研究中对这些震颤的临床和加速度计特征进行比较。我们评估了42例帕金森病患者中两种震颤类型的疾病特征和加速度计测量结果。比较了两种震颤类型的疾病特异性特征以及峰值频率、峰值频率处的振幅和均方根(RMS)振幅的加速度计测量结果。18例患者有再发性震颤,再发性震颤的平均潜伏期为9.48(±9.2)秒。仅静止性震颤组和再发性震颤组在疾病发病年龄、病程、严重程度和左旋多巴等效剂量均值方面无显著差异。两组之间的峰值频率和峰值频率处的振幅比较无差异,但再发性震颤组的RMS振幅显著更高(p=0.03)。再发性震颤的RMS振幅也与疾病严重程度相关(r=0.48,p=0.04)。这些结果支持了之前的观点,即静止性震颤和再发性震颤类似,两者均由同一中枢振荡器触发,而再发性震颤只是由于手臂重新定位对静止性震颤的抑制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验