McGarry Ross
University of Liverpool, UK.
Illn Crises Loss. 2017 Jan;25(1):63-84. doi: 10.1177/1054137316675717. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
The purpose of this article is to illustrate prescient issues relating to current and ex-military communities in the United Kingdom who have featured heavily within the policy arena over the past decade in relation to several key areas of importance. It will be illustrated how this population becomes visible within the public imagination (via military losses), how discourses relating to the harms they experience are structured and articulated within political and policy domains (particularly in relation to mental health) via "state talk" (qua Sim), and what the potential social consequences are for politically rendering an unproblematized populist view of current and ex-military communities (i.e., pending crises). This argument is made with the express intention of reengaging critical recognition of the distancing of the military institution from the physical and psychological vulnerability of those who have participated in war and military environments. This is an argument returned to pertinence from the recent publication of the Chilcot Inquiry into British involvement in the Iraq war.
本文旨在阐述与英国现役及退役军人社区相关的前瞻性问题,在过去十年中,这些问题在政策领域的几个关键重要领域中占据了显著位置。将说明这一群体如何在公众想象中变得可见(通过军事伤亡),与他们所经历的伤害相关的话语如何通过“国家话语”(如西姆所说)在政治和政策领域(特别是在心理健康方面)得以构建和表达,以及在政治上呈现对现役及退役军人社区毫无问题的民粹主义观点(即潜在危机)会产生哪些潜在的社会后果。提出这一论点的明确意图是重新唤起人们对军事机构与参与战争及军事环境者的身体和心理脆弱性之间距离的批判性认识。这一论点因近期奇尔科特对英国参与伊拉克战争调查的公布而重新具有相关性。