Finnell Karla Jaye, John Robert, Thompson David M
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Public Health, 801 Northeast 13th Street, Room 445, Post Office Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, United States.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Public Health, 801 Northeast 13th Street, Room 321, Post Office Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 1;5:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.017. eCollection 2017 Mar.
This study evaluated the effect of a 12-week social marketing intervention conducted in 2012 promoting 1% milk use relying on paid advertising. Weekly milk sales data by type of milk (whole, 2%, 1%, and nonfat milk) were collected from 80 supermarkets in the Oklahoma City media market, the intervention market, and 66 supermarkets in the Tulsa media market (TMM), the comparison market. The effect was measured with a paired -test. A mixed segmented regression model, controlling for the contextual difference between supermarkets and data correlation, identified trends before, during, and after the intervention. Results show the monthly market share of 1% milk sales changed from 10.0% to 11.5%, a 15% increase. Evaluating the volume sold, the monthly mean number of gallons of 1% milk sold increased from 890.5 gal ( = 769.8) per supermarket from before the intervention to 1070.7 gal ( = 922.5) following the intervention (t(79) = 9.4, = 0.000). Moreover, average weekly sales of 1% milk were stable prior to the intervention (b = - 0.2 gal/week, 95% CI [- 0.6 gal/week, 0.3 gal/week]). During each additional week of the intervention, 1% milk sales increased by an average of 4.1 gal in all supermarkets (95% CI [3.5 gal/week, 4.6 gal/week]). Three months later, albeit attenuated, a significant increase in 1% milk sales remained. In the comparison market, no change in the market share of 1% milk occurred. Paid advertising, using the principles of social marketing, can be effective in changing an entrenched and habitual nutrition habit.
本研究评估了2012年开展的一项为期12周的社会营销干预措施的效果,该措施依靠付费广告来推广1%低脂牛奶的消费。从俄克拉荷马城媒体市场(干预市场)的80家超市以及塔尔萨媒体市场(TMM,对照市场)的66家超市收集了按牛奶类型(全脂、2%低脂、1%低脂和脱脂牛奶)分类的每周牛奶销售数据。通过配对t检验来衡量干预效果。一个混合分段回归模型,控制了超市之间的背景差异和数据相关性,确定了干预前、干预期间和干预后的趋势。结果显示,1%低脂牛奶的月度市场份额从10.0%变为11.5%,增长了15%。从销售数量来看,干预前每家超市每月1%低脂牛奶的平均销售量为890.5加仑(标准差=769.8),干预后增至1070.7加仑(标准差=922.5)(t(79)=9.4,P=0.000)。此外,干预前1%低脂牛奶的平均每周销售量较为稳定(b=-0.2加仑/周,95%置信区间[-0.6加仑/周, 0.3加仑/周])。在干预的每一周,所有超市1%低脂牛奶的销售量平均增加4.1加仑(95%置信区间[3.5加仑/周, 4.6加仑/周])。三个月后,尽管增幅有所减弱,但1%低脂牛奶的销售量仍显著增加。在对照市场,1%低脂牛奶的市场份额没有变化。运用社会营销原理的付费广告能够有效地改变一种根深蒂固的习惯性营养习惯。