Jiang Jason, Southern Danielle, Beck Cynthia A, James Matthew, Lu Mingshan, Quan Hude
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Jiang, Southern, Beck, James, Lu, Quan), Psychiatry (Beck), Medicine (James) and Economics (Lu), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
CMAJ Open. 2016 Oct 28;4(4):E646-E653. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160128. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec.
Surveillance using coded administrative health data has shown that the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in Canada increased substantially between 1998 to 2008. These findings require an assumption that the validity of hypertension and diabetes coding is stable over time. We tested this assumption by examining temporal trends in the validity of coding for hypertension and diabetes in the Canadian hospital Discharge Abstract Database.
We used the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database, a clinical registry, as the reference standard to evaluate the validity of the Discharge Abstract Database in recording hypertension and diabetes in Alberta. The APPROACH database contains data for all Alberta residents who have undergone cardiac catheterization and includes prospective ascertainment of comorbid conditions before each procedure. We linked patient data between the 2 databases for 2002 to 2013 using patient provincial health number. Temporal trends in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Cohen κ were calculated for both hypertension and diabetes in the Discharge Abstract Database.
We matched 63 483 patients between the APPROACH database and the Discharge Abstract Database. The validity of the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes remained mostly consistent over time. Between 2002 and 2013, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value ranged from 66% to 87% for hypertension and from 81% to 98% for diabetes; the corresponding κ scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.62 and from 0.80 to 0.89. No significant differences in the validity of coding were found across age, sex or hospital location subgroups.
The validity of coding for hypertension and diabetes in the Discharge Abstract Database remained fairly consistent between 2002 and 2013. Our findings support the use of the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes surveillance in hospital settings.
利用编码后的行政健康数据进行监测显示,1998年至2008年间,加拿大高血压和糖尿病的患病率大幅上升。这些发现需要一个假设,即高血压和糖尿病编码的有效性随时间推移保持稳定。我们通过研究加拿大医院出院摘要数据库中高血压和糖尿病编码有效性的时间趋势来检验这一假设。
我们使用阿尔伯塔省冠心病结局评估项目(APPROACH)数据库(一个临床登记库)作为参考标准,以评估出院摘要数据库在记录阿尔伯塔省高血压和糖尿病方面的有效性。APPROACH数据库包含了所有接受过心脏导管插入术的阿尔伯塔省居民的数据,并包括每次手术前合并症的前瞻性确定。我们使用患者的省级健康编号将2002年至2013年期间两个数据库中的患者数据进行了关联。计算了出院摘要数据库中高血压和糖尿病的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和科恩κ值的时间趋势。
我们在APPROACH数据库和出院摘要数据库之间匹配了63483名患者。出院摘要数据库对高血压和糖尿病的有效性随时间基本保持一致。2002年至2013年间,高血压的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值在66%至87%之间,糖尿病的在81%至98%之间;相应的κ值在0.50至0.62之间以及0.80至0.89之间。在年龄、性别或医院位置亚组中,编码有效性未发现显著差异。
出院摘要数据库中高血压和糖尿病编码的有效性在2002年至2013年间保持相当一致。我们的研究结果支持在医院环境中使用出院摘要数据库进行高血压和糖尿病监测。