Pang J A, Chan H S, Chan C Y, Cheung S W, French G L
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin N.T.
Ann Intern Med. 1989 Oct 15;111(8):650-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-8-650.
To determine whether the detection of tuberculostearic acid (TBSA) in bronchial aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens is useful for the rapid diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis in patients suspected of having the disease.
A pulmonary clinic in a teaching hospital.
Forty patients suspected of active pulmonary tuberculosis but who failed to produce sputum or whose sputum smears were negative for acid-fast bacilli on at least 3 occasions, 29 of whom were subsequently confirmed to have tuberculosis. A group of 13 patients who were having fiberoptic bronchoscopy for other reasons served as controls.
All patients had fiberoptic bronchoscopy; bronchial aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage, and sputum specimens were obtained when possible.
All specimens were examined microscopically for acid-fast bacilli, cultured for mycobacteria, and assayed for TBSA by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring. Only 4 of the 29 patients with tuberculosis were diagnosed by direct microscopy compared with 26 by TBSA assay. In 2 patients who required surgical biopsy for conventional diagnosis, the TBSA test was positive. There were no false-positive TBSA results in the 13 controls, but 2 of 5 sputum specimens from the 11 test patients in whom tuberculosis was excluded were falsely positive, probably because of contamination with mouth flora. Because sputum can rarely be obtained from these patients and may give false-positive results, it is not a good specimen for TBSA assay. Sensitivities and specificities of the test for the other specimens were as follows: aspirate, 0.52 (CI, 0.32 to 0.71) and 1.00 (CI, 0.75 to 1.00); lavage, 0.68 (CI, 0.46 to 0.85) and 1.00 (CI, 0.84 to 1.00); aspirate and lavage combined, 0.79 (CI, 0.60 to 0.92) and 1.00 (CI, 0.86 to 1.00).
The TBSA assay for bronchial aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is useful for rapidly diagnosing "smear-negative" pulmonary tuberculosis. In these specimens it is highly specific and more sensitive than microscopy. This assay could be used to diagnose other mycobacterial infections, however, it cannot distinguish among species.
确定检测支气管吸出物和支气管肺泡灌洗标本中的结核硬脂酸(TBSA)是否有助于快速诊断疑似患有活动性肺结核的患者。
一家教学医院的肺部门诊。
40例疑似活动性肺结核但无法咳出痰液或痰涂片至少3次抗酸杆菌阴性的患者,其中29例随后被确诊患有肺结核。一组因其他原因接受纤维支气管镜检查的13例患者作为对照。
所有患者均接受纤维支气管镜检查;尽可能获取支气管吸出物、支气管肺泡灌洗物和痰液标本。
所有标本均进行抗酸杆菌显微镜检查、分枝杆菌培养,并通过气相色谱和质谱选择离子监测法检测TBSA。29例肺结核患者中,仅4例通过直接显微镜检查确诊,而通过TBSA检测确诊的有26例。在2例需要手术活检进行常规诊断的患者中,TBSA检测呈阳性。13例对照患者中TBSA检测结果无假阳性,但在排除肺结核的11例检测患者的5份痰液标本中,有2份出现假阳性,可能是由于口腔菌群污染。由于这些患者很少能咳出痰液且可能出现假阳性结果,因此痰液不是TBSA检测的良好标本。其他标本检测的敏感性和特异性如下:吸出物,0.52(95%置信区间,0.32至0.71)和1.00(95%置信区间,0.75至1.00);灌洗物,0.68(95%置信区间,0.46至0.85)和1.00(95%置信区间,0.84至1.00);吸出物和灌洗物联合检测,0.79(95%置信区间,0.60至0.92)和1.00(95%置信区间,0.86至1.00)。
支气管吸出物和支气管肺泡灌洗液的TBSA检测有助于快速诊断“涂片阴性”肺结核。在这些标本中,该检测具有高度特异性且比显微镜检查更敏感。该检测可用于诊断其他分枝杆菌感染,然而,它无法区分不同菌种。