Keenan Lorna G, O'Brien Michelle, Ryan Tim, Dunne Mary, McArdle Orla
St Lukes Radiation Oncology Network, St Lukes Hospital, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland.
St Lukes Radiation Oncology Network, St Lukes Hospital, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 May;8(3):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
In this study we evaluate the usefulness of the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) in predicting which older patients are at risk of developing serious toxicities during radiotherapy.
This prospective study was carried out over an 18month period. Our primary aim was to examine the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) as a predictor of toxicity in patients over 70years undergoing radical radiotherapy for any malignant diagnosis.
63 patients were recruited: 29% experienced grade 3 or greater toxicities, with very few having multiple grade 3 or greater toxicities. The majority of patients experienced multiple grade 1 or 2 toxicities. Patients were often admitted: either electively due to geographical reasons, or due to toxicities. All patients completed their courses of radiotherapy. All grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred within five radiotherapy sites; upper GI, gynaecological, lung, prostate and head & neck. There was no statistical correlation between EFS score and the presence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities.
This study showed that neither EFS score, age nor ECOG performance status were predictive of radiotherapy toxicity, breaks in treatment or hospital admissions. Patients with oesophageal cancer, gynaecological cancers and lung cancer had a high rate of toxicity and hospital admission, which may highlight the need for additional patient support in these groups. Whilst comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended, further research is needed to conclude if the frail elderly patient is at greater risk of toxicities from radiotherapy, and which geriatric assessment tool may be the most helpful.
在本研究中,我们评估埃德蒙顿衰弱量表(EFS)在预测哪些老年患者在放疗期间有发生严重毒性反应风险方面的实用性。
这项前瞻性研究历时18个月。我们的主要目的是检验埃德蒙顿衰弱量表(EFS)作为70岁以上因任何恶性诊断接受根治性放疗患者毒性反应预测指标的有效性。
招募了63例患者:29%经历了3级或更高级别的毒性反应,很少有患者出现多种3级或更高级别的毒性反应。大多数患者经历了多种1级或2级毒性反应。患者经常入院:要么因地理原因选择性入院,要么因毒性反应入院。所有患者均完成了放疗疗程。所有3级或4级毒性反应均发生在五个放疗部位;上消化道、妇科、肺部、前列腺及头颈部。EFS评分与3级或4级毒性反应的存在之间无统计学相关性。
本研究表明,EFS评分、年龄及ECOG体能状态均不能预测放疗毒性反应、治疗中断或住院情况。食管癌、妇科癌症和肺癌患者的毒性反应和住院率较高,这可能凸显了这些人群需要额外的患者支持。虽然推荐进行全面的老年综合评估,但仍需进一步研究以确定衰弱老年患者是否面临更高的放疗毒性反应风险,以及哪种老年评估工具可能最有帮助。