Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Clinic of Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0283507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283507. eCollection 2023.
Several screening tools are developed to identify frailty in the increasing number of older patients with cancer. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) performs well in geriatric settings but is less studied in oncology. We aimed to investigate if EFS score (continuous and categorical) predicts survival in patients referred for radiotherapy, and to assess the concurrent validity of EFS compared with a modified geriatric assessment (mGA).
Prospective observational, single-center study including patients ≥65 years, referred for curative or palliative radiotherapy for confirmed cancer. Patients underwent mGA (assessment of cognition, mobility, falls, comorbidity, polypharmacy, depression, nutrition, and activities of daily living) and screening with EFS prior to radiotherapy. The predictive value of EFS score of two-year overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression model was estimated to adjust the associations for major cancer-related factors. Concurrent validity of EFS in relation to mGA was estimated by Spearman`s correlation coefficient and ordinal regression. Sensitivity and specificity for different cut-offs was assessed.
Patients' (n = 301) mean age was 73.6 (SD 6.3) years, 159 (52.8%) were men, 54% received curative-intent treatment, breast cancer (32%) was the most prevalent diagnosis. According to EFS≥6, 101 (33.7%) were classified as frail. EFS score was predictive of OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.30)], as was increasing severity assessed by categorical EFS (p<0.001). There was a strong correlation between EFS score and number of geriatric impairments (Spearman`s correlation coefficient 0.77). EFS cut-off ≥6 had a sensitivity of 0.97 and specificity of 0.57 for identifying patients with minimum two geriatric impairments.
EFS predicts mortality in older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, and it is a quick (<5 minutes) and sensitive screening tool to identify patients who may benefit from a geriatric assessment.
为了应对日益增多的老年癌症患者,已经开发出几种筛选工具来识别虚弱。埃德蒙顿虚弱量表(EFS)在老年人群中表现良好,但在肿瘤学领域的研究较少。我们旨在研究 EFS 评分(连续和分类)是否可预测接受放疗的患者的生存情况,并评估 EFS 与改良老年评估(mGA)相比的同时效度。
前瞻性观察性单中心研究,纳入年龄≥65 岁、因确诊癌症接受根治性或姑息性放疗的患者。患者在放疗前接受 mGA(认知、移动能力、跌倒、合并症、多药治疗、抑郁、营养和日常生活活动能力评估)和 EFS 筛查。通过 Kaplan-Meier 图评估 EFS 评分对两年总生存(OS)的预测价值,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型调整与主要癌症相关因素的关联。通过 Spearman 相关系数和有序回归估计 EFS 与 mGA 的同时效度。评估不同截断值的敏感性和特异性。
患者(n=301)的平均年龄为 73.6(SD 6.3)岁,159 名(52.8%)为男性,54%接受了根治性治疗,乳腺癌(32%)是最常见的诊断。根据 EFS≥6,101 名(33.7%)被归类为虚弱。EFS 评分是 OS 的预测因素[风险比(HR)1.20(95%置信区间(CI)1.10-1.30)],分类 EFS 的严重程度增加也是如此(p<0.001)。EFS 评分与老年损伤数量之间存在很强的相关性(Spearman 相关系数 0.77)。EFS 截断值≥6 对识别至少有 2 项老年损伤的患者具有 0.97 的敏感性和 0.57 的特异性。
EFS 可预测接受放疗的老年癌症患者的死亡率,它是一种快速(<5 分钟)且敏感的筛查工具,可识别可能受益于老年评估的患者。