Dave Chirag N, Seifman Brian, Chennamsetty Avinash, Frontera Rene, Faraj Kassem, Nelson Ryan, Lucido Colleen, Schervish Edward W
Beaumont Health System, Department of Urology, Royal Oak, MI.
Beaumont Health System, Department of Urology, Royal Oak, MI; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI; Michigan Institute of Urology, Troy, MI.
Urology. 2017 Apr;102:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.026. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB) performed in the office setting by urologists.
This is a retrospective study involving patients who underwent office-based US-guided percutaneous RMB between April 2010 and October 2015. Baseline vital signs and US were performed prior to the procedure. Patients were then observed for 1 hour after the procedure and repeat vital signs and US were performed. Hemodynamically stable patients who did not develop hematoma were discharged.
In 108 patients, 70 (64.8%) were male, median age was 69.5 years, and median mass size was 3.3 cm (interquartile range: 2.5-4.6). Biopsy yield was as follows: 72 (66.7%) had renal cell carcinoma, 14 (13.0%) had benign renal parenchyma, 11 (10.2%) had oncocytoma, 6 (5.6%) had angiomyolipoma, 2 (1.9%) had lymphoma, and 3 (2.8%) had other disease. The initial nondiagnostic rate was 14 of 108 (13.0%). There were 28 of 108 (25.9%) patients observed whereas 79 of 108 (73.2%) received surgery or ablative therapy. Final pathology was concordant with biopsy results in 66 of 68 (97.1%) cases. Three patients experienced a grade I Clavien-Dindo surgical complication, all of which were managed conservatively.
Office-based US-guided RMB is safe and efficacious in the management of appropriately selected SRM. It potentially offers improved dynamic characterization of solid renal mass, greater convenience to patients, as well as cost savings. Further studies are needed to evaluate this promising technique.
评估泌尿外科医生在门诊环境下进行超声(US)引导下经皮肾肿物活检(RMB)的安全性和有效性。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2010年4月至2015年10月期间在门诊接受US引导下经皮RMB的患者。在操作前进行基线生命体征检查和超声检查。术后对患者观察1小时,然后重复进行生命体征检查和超声检查。血流动力学稳定且未发生血肿的患者出院。
108例患者中,70例(64.8%)为男性,中位年龄为69.5岁,肿物中位大小为3.3 cm(四分位间距:2.5 - 4.6)。活检结果如下:72例(66.7%)为肾细胞癌,14例(13.0%)为良性肾实质,11例(10.2%)为嗜酸细胞瘤,6例(5.6%)为肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤,2例(1.9%)为淋巴瘤,3例(2.8%)为其他疾病。初始未明确诊断率为108例中的14例(13.0%)。108例患者中有28例(25.9%)接受了观察,而108例中有79例(73.2%)接受了手术或消融治疗。68例中的66例(97.1%)最终病理结果与活检结果一致。3例患者发生了I级Clavien - Dindo手术并发症,均经保守治疗。
门诊US引导下的RMB在适当选择的肾实性肿物管理中是安全有效的。它可能改善肾实性肿物的动态特征,为患者提供更大便利,并节省成本。需要进一步研究来评估这项有前景的技术。