Smith R A, Gutendorf R W, McCloskey J
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, College of Science & Mathematics Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):332-6.
Data are presented to demonstrate the utility of genetic marker analysis in cases of disputed paternity in which the alleged father is deceased prior to testing. The first case involves the histocompatibility (HLA) typing of the alleged father's parents and presumed mother and child, in which the deceased alleged father (AF) was not excluded from paternity. The second case involves a similar situation. However, the deceased AF was not clearly excluded from paternity in the HLA system owing to the inability to rule out gene suppression or deletion, but the deceased AF was excluded following red blood cell antigen typing of the man's parents. These two cases demonstrate the utility of genetic marker analysis in cases of disputed paternity in which the AF is deceased. This same type of analysis can be applied to cases in which the presumed mother is either deceased or missing and custody of the child is being sought by the alleged father.
本文呈现的数据旨在证明基因标记分析在生父关系存疑案件中的实用性,此类案件中被指控的父亲在检测前已去世。第一个案例涉及对被指控父亲的父母以及推定的母亲和孩子进行组织相容性(HLA)分型,在此案例中,已故的被指控父亲未被排除为生父。第二个案例情况类似。然而,由于无法排除基因抑制或缺失的可能性,在HLA系统中已故的被指控父亲并未被明确排除为生父,但在对该男子的父母进行红细胞抗原分型后,已故的被指控父亲被排除了。这两个案例证明了基因标记分析在被指控父亲已去世的生父关系存疑案件中的实用性。同样类型的分析也可应用于推定母亲已去世或失踪且被指控父亲寻求孩子监护权的案件。