Suppr超能文献

一次简短的教育课程会为等待三级慢性疼痛服务的个体带来积极改变吗?

Does a Brief Educational Session Produce Positive Change for Individuals Waiting for Tertiary Chronic Pain Services?

作者信息

Burke Anne L J, Denson Linley A, Mathias Jane L

机构信息

*Pain Management Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia

School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):2203-2217. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw125. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine: 1) whether a single brief pre-clinic educational session improved the well-being and quality of life of individuals entering the wait-list for a tertiary chronic pain (CP) service; and 2) the impact of waiting for services on these outcomes.

METHODS

Participants were 346 adults, with basic English skills and non-urgent triage codes, who were recruited on referral to a tertiary Australian metropolitan CP unit. Participants were randomized across two conditions: "treatment as usual" (normal wait-list) and "experimental" (normal wait-list plus a 3-hour CP educational session). The educational session encouraged self-management and life engagement despite pain. Multiple outcomes (pain acceptance, pain-related interference, psychological distress, health care utilization [frequency, types], quality of life, health knowledge/beliefs), as well as pain severity and symptom exaggeration, were assessed at intake and again at 2 weeks and 6 months post-educational session (or equivalent for the wait-list group).

RESULTS

Satisfaction with the educational session was moderate-to-high, but attendance was not associated with improved outcomes. At 2 weeks, all study participants reported significant improvements in pain acceptance (willingness, overall acceptance), health care utilization (frequency) and quality of life (physical), which were maintained/enhanced at 6 months. Use of psychological and physical therapies increased significantly by 6 months. There was no functional deterioration while wait-listed.

CONCLUSIONS

Attending a brief pre-clinic education session did not improve function. There was no deterioration in wait-listed participants who agreed to be involved in research and who completed study measures at 2 and 6 months, but referral was associated with short-term functional improvements. This is the first study to link positive change with referral to, rather than treatment by, a tertiary CP service.

摘要

目的

探讨:1)单次简短的门诊前教育课程是否能改善进入三级慢性疼痛(CP)服务等候名单的个体的幸福感和生活质量;2)等待服务对这些结果的影响。

方法

研究对象为346名具备基本英语技能且非紧急分诊代码的成年人,他们经转诊至澳大利亚大都市的一家三级CP科室。参与者被随机分配到两种情况:“常规治疗”(正常等候名单)和“实验性”(正常等候名单加3小时的CP教育课程)。该教育课程鼓励患者在疼痛的情况下进行自我管理和参与生活。在入组时以及教育课程结束后2周和6个月(或等候名单组的等效时间)对多种结果(疼痛接受度、疼痛相关干扰、心理困扰、医疗保健利用情况[频率、类型]、生活质量、健康知识/信念)以及疼痛严重程度和症状夸大情况进行评估。

结果

对教育课程的满意度为中到高,但出席情况与改善结果无关。在2周时,所有研究参与者报告在疼痛接受度(意愿、总体接受度)、医疗保健利用情况(频率)和生活质量(身体方面)方面有显著改善,这些改善在6个月时得以维持/增强。到6个月时,心理和物理治疗的使用显著增加。在等候名单上时功能没有恶化。

结论

参加简短的门诊前教育课程并未改善功能。同意参与研究并在2个月和6个月完成研究测量的等候名单上的参与者功能没有恶化,但转诊与短期功能改善相关。这是第一项将积极变化与转诊至三级CP服务而非接受其治疗联系起来的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验