Suppr超能文献

[骨痂延长术治疗股骨和胫骨创伤后缺损]

[Callus Distraction in the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Defects of the Femur and Tibia].

作者信息

Veselý R, Procházka V

机构信息

Úrazová nemocnice v Brně.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83(6):388-392.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Evaluation of the results in patients treated for post-traumatic defects by the method of callus distraction of the femur and tibia using a monolateral external fixator. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group comprised 42 patients, 38 men and 4 woman, who underwent callus distraction using a monolateral external fixator in the Trauma Hospital Brno in the period from 2003 to 2010. The average age of the patients on the day gradual callus distraction was commenced was 32 (18-64) years. Post-traumatic bone defects were treated in 31 patients and deformities resulting from resection of post-traumatic infection loci in 11 patients. The tibia was involved in 34 and the femur in eight patients. The average follow-up in the out-patient department was 24.3 months (range, 7 to 118 months) after the fixator had been removed. The monolateral external fixator LRS Orthofix (Italy) was used in all patients. RESULTS The average length of defects treated by callus distraction was 5.5 cm (3-16 cm). The average interval between osteotomy and distraction commencement was 6.1 days (4-8 days). The average duration of distraction was 74 days (33-162 days); the average time of fixator application was 168 days (138-416 days). The average healing index was 42 days per cm of bone (26-88 days per cm). The treatment of soft tissue loss during callus distraction was necessary in six patients (14.3%). Of these, two (4.8%) had local fasciocutaneous flap skin coverage, and four (9.5%) free issue transfer. A total of 38 complications were treated, i.e., 0.9 complication per each callus distraction of the femur or tibia. Of them, pin-tract infection was most frequent and was recorded in 21 patients (50%). It was usually managed by regimen arrangement and oral antibiotic therapy. The screw had to be removed due to septic loosening in five patients (11.9%). Breakage of a fixator pin occurred in three patients (7.1%). No fracture after fixator removal was recorded. Callus angulations were managed by correction of fixator during distraction in two patients (4,8%). In one patient (2.4%), premature healing of fibular osteotomy was treated by a new resection osteotomy. One patient (2.4%), following callus distraction, underwent Achilles tenotomy. The docking site after segmental bone transport did not heal in two patients (4.8%) who subsequently underwent revision surgery involving spongioplasty; bone union was achieved. Callus distraction in all patients was completed with the use of external fixators initially applied. All patients achieved full weight-bearing on the treated extremity. DISCUSSION In this study we evaluated the results of callus distraction carried out by means of a monolateral external fixator. This type of fixation seems very useful because the telescopic system allows for adjustment without necessity to change its assembly. Dynamic adjustment is important at the stage of callus maturation. A monolateral fixator is better tolerated by patients than is a circular fixator, though both systems give the same results. The process of callus distraction is associated with many different complications. Neither the height of femoral or tibial osteotomy, nor the method of its performance had any significant effect on callus formation. Spin-tract infection is the most common complication. Its frequency can be reduced by using 6-mm pins coated with hydroxyapatite. Delayed healing is rare in simple callus distraction but occurs in the cases of segmental bone transport or repeated osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS The method of callus distraction is effective in the management of large bone defects. The treatment procedure depends on the extent of bone loss, size and type of soft tissue damage and presence or absence of infection. We prefer the use of monolateral external fixators for their ability of form adjustment and of 6-mm pins coated with hydroxyapatite. Key words: callus distraction, post-traumatic bone defect, external fixator.

摘要

研究目的

采用单侧外固定器对股骨和胫骨进行骨痂牵张治疗创伤后骨缺损患者,评估其治疗结果。材料与方法:该组共42例患者,其中男性38例,女性4例,于2003年至2010年期间在布尔诺创伤医院接受单侧外固定器骨痂牵张治疗。开始逐步进行骨痂牵张时患者的平均年龄为32岁(18 - 64岁)。31例患者治疗创伤后骨缺损,11例患者治疗创伤后感染灶切除所致畸形。34例累及胫骨,8例累及股骨。拆除固定器后门诊平均随访时间为24.3个月(范围7至118个月)。所有患者均使用意大利LRS Orthofix单侧外固定器。结果:骨痂牵张治疗的缺损平均长度为5.5 cm(3 - 16 cm)。截骨与开始牵张的平均间隔时间为6.1天(4 - 8天)。平均牵张持续时间为74天(33 - 162天);固定器平均应用时间为168天(138 - 416天)。平均愈合指数为每厘米骨42天(每厘米26 - 88天)。6例患者(14.3%)在骨痂牵张期间需要治疗软组织缺损。其中,2例(4.8%)采用局部筋膜皮瓣覆盖,4例(9.5%)采用游离组织移植。共治疗38例并发症,即股骨或胫骨每例骨痂牵张出现0.9例并发症。其中,针道感染最为常见,21例患者(50%)出现该情况。通常通过调整治疗方案及口服抗生素治疗。5例患者(11.9%)因感染性松动不得不取出螺钉。3例患者(7.1%)出现固定针断裂。拆除固定器后未记录到骨折情况。2例患者(4.8%)在牵张过程中通过调整固定器纠正骨痂成角。1例患者(2.4%)腓骨截骨过早愈合,通过再次截骨治疗。1例患者(2.4%)在骨痂牵张后行跟腱切断术。2例患者(4.8%)节段性骨搬运后的对接部位未愈合,随后接受包括植骨术的翻修手术;实现了骨愈合。所有患者均使用最初应用的外固定器完成骨痂牵张。所有患者治疗肢体均实现完全负重。讨论:在本研究中,我们评估了采用单侧外固定器进行骨痂牵张的结果。这种固定方式似乎非常有用,因为伸缩系统允许进行调整而无需改变其组装。在骨痂成熟阶段动态调整很重要。单侧固定器比环形固定器患者耐受性更好,尽管两种系统效果相同。骨痂牵张过程伴有许多不同并发症。股骨或胫骨截骨的高度及其操作方法对骨痂形成均无显著影响。针道感染是最常见的并发症。使用涂有羟基磷灰石的6 mm针可降低其发生率。单纯骨痂牵张很少出现延迟愈合,但在节段性骨搬运或反复截骨的情况下会发生。结论:骨痂牵张方法在治疗大的骨缺损方面有效。治疗程序取决于骨丢失程度、软组织损伤的大小和类型以及有无感染。我们更倾向于使用单侧外固定器,因其具有形状调整能力以及涂有羟基磷灰石的6 mm针。关键词:骨痂牵张;创伤后骨缺损;外固定器

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验