McLean Kenneth A, Camilleri-Brennan Julian, Knight Stephen R, Drake Thomas M, Ots Riinu, Shaw Catherine A, Wigmore Stephen J, Harrison Ewen M
Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Liver Transpl. 2017 May;23(5):594-603. doi: 10.1002/lt.24715.
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts are increasingly used for transplantation. However, the posttransplantation clinical and quality of life outcomes of DCD recipients are traditionally considered to be inferior compared with donation after brain death (DBD) allograft recipients. Decision making for such marginal organs can be difficult. This study investigated the optimal decision to accept or decline a DCD liver allograft for a patient based on their current health. A Markov decision process model was constructed to predict the 5-year clinical course of patients on the liver transplant waiting list. Clinical outcomes were determined from the UK transplant registry or appropriate literature. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were determined using the condition-specific short form of liver disease quality of life (SF-LDQoL) questionnaire. There were 293/374 (78.3%) eligible patients who completed the SF-LDQoL questionnaire. A total of 73 respondents (24.9%) were before transplant and 220 were after transplant (DBD recipient, 56.3%; DCD recipient, 8.5%; ischemic cholangiopathy patient, 2.4%; retransplant recipient, 7.9%). Predictive modeling indicated that QALYs gained at 5 years were significantly higher in DCD recipients (3.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.44-4.10) compared with those who remained on the waiting list for a DBD transplant with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of 15-20 (3.36; 95% CI, 3.28-3.43), or >20 (3.07; 95% CI, 3.00-3.14). There was no significant advantage for individuals with MELD scores <15 (3.55; 95% CI, 3.47-3.63). In conclusion, this model predicts that patients on the UK liver transplant waiting list with MELD scores >15 should receive an offered DCD allograft based on the QALYs gained at 5 years. This analysis only accounts for donor-recipient risk pairings seen in current practice. The optimal decision for patients with MELD scores <15 remains unclear. However, a survival benefit was observed when a DCD organ was accepted. Liver Transplantation 23 594-603 2017 AASLD.
心脏死亡后捐赠(DCD)的肝脏移植越来越多地用于肝脏移植。然而,传统上认为DCD受者移植后的临床结局和生活质量比脑死亡后捐赠(DBD)的肝脏移植受者要差。对于这类边缘器官进行决策可能很困难。本研究基于患者当前的健康状况,调查了接受或拒绝DCD肝脏移植的最佳决策。构建了一个马尔可夫决策过程模型,以预测肝移植等待名单上患者的5年临床病程。临床结局由英国移植登记处或适当的文献确定。使用特定疾病的肝病生活质量简表(SF-LDQoL)问卷确定质量调整生命年(QALY)。共有293/374名(78.3%)符合条件的患者完成了SF-LDQoL问卷。共有73名受访者(24.9%)在移植前,220名在移植后(DBD受者,56.3%;DCD受者,8.5%;缺血性胆管病患者,2.4%;再次移植受者,7.9%)。预测模型表明,与终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分为15 - 20且仍在等待DBD移植的患者(3.36;95%置信区间[CI],3.28 - 3.43)或评分>20的患者(3.07;95%CI,3.00 - 3.14)相比,DCD受者在5年时获得的QALY显著更高(3.77;95%CI,3.44 - 4.10)。MELD评分<15的个体没有显著优势(3.55;95%CI,3.47 - 3.63)。总之,该模型预测,英国肝移植等待名单上MELD评分>15的患者应根据5年时获得的QALY接受提供的DCD移植肝脏。该分析仅考虑了当前实践中观察到的供体 - 受体风险配对。MELD评分<15的患者的最佳决策仍不清楚。然而,接受DCD器官时观察到了生存益处。《肝脏移植》2017年第23卷594 - 603页美国肝病研究协会。