Berenstein Nadia
University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Hist Sci. 2016 Dec;54(4):399-424. doi: 10.1177/0073275316681802. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
How did vanilla, once a rare luxury, become a global sensation? Rather than taking the vanilla flavor of vanilla beans as a pre-existing natural fact, this essay argues that the sensory experience that came to be recognized as vanilla was a hybrid artifact produced by an expanding global trade in a diverse set of pleasurable substances, including cured beans from artificially pollinated vanilla orchids, synthetic vanillin, sugar, and a far-flung miscellany of other botanical and chemical materials. Global trade and large-scale production resulted not in the production of a homogenous, stable commodity, but in a range of local vanillas, heterogeneous mixtures with a range of qualities and virtues. As local commercial and regulatory interests competed to define the origins, and thus the market value, of authentic vanilla flavor, scientific experts were called upon to adjudicate these rival claims. In the United States, these debates played out in the context of the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act, where efforts to define and chemically enforce a 'standard' vanilla extract, in contradistinction from adulterated, 'imitation' extracts, clashed with the interests of makers and users of both synthetic and 'genuine' vanilla flavorings. As regulatory chemists grappled with the growing variety of vanillas, they were required to determine the appropriate chemical components of genuine vanilla, and consequently to delimit the subjective sensory effects proper to the flavor. Nonetheless, the materials, experiences, and meanings popularly associated with vanilla flavor continued to exceed the limits prescribed by officials.
曾经是稀有奢侈品的香草是如何成为全球热门的呢?本文并非将香草豆的香草味视为既定的自然事实,而是认为被认定为香草的感官体验是一种混合产物,它由包括人工授粉香草兰花的加工豆、合成香草醛、糖以及其他种类繁多的植物和化学材料在内的一系列令人愉悦的物质的全球贸易扩张所产生。全球贸易和大规模生产并未带来单一、稳定商品的产生,而是产生了一系列本地香草,即具有不同品质和优点的异质混合物。由于地方商业和监管利益方竞相界定正宗香草味的来源,进而界定其市场价值,于是便请科学专家来评判这些相互竞争的主张。在美国,这些辩论是在1906年《纯净食品和药品法案》的背景下展开的,在该法案中,界定并通过化学手段强制实施一种“标准”香草精(与掺假的“仿冒”香草精形成对比)的努力,与合成香草味和“正宗”香草味的制造商及使用者的利益发生了冲突。当监管化学家努力应对种类日益繁多的香草时,他们需要确定正宗香草的合适化学成分,进而界定该风味特有的主观感官效果。尽管如此,与香草味普遍相关的材料、体验和意义仍然超出了官方规定的范围。