Pour A M, Masir N, Rose I M
UKM Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Malays J Pathol. 2016 Dec;38(3):229-233.
To assess the diagnostic utility of glypican-3 (GPC-3) in comparison to Hep Par 1 in the diagnosis of liver tumours, a cross-sectional study involving 66 resected liver tumours were tested for the protein expression of these markers by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. Of the 66 cases, 26 (39.4%) were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 4 (6.1%) were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 36 (54.5%) were metastatic tumours. Hep Par 1 and GPC-3 expressions in HCC were 24/26 (92.3%) and 19/26 (73.1%) respectively. In contrast, of non-HCC cases, only 2/40 cases (5.0%) expressed Hep Par 1, including a metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma and a metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. GPC-3 was expressed in 3/40 cases (7.5%), i.e. a metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, a metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The sensitivity and specificity for Hep Par 1 were 92.3% and 95% respectively while that of GPC-3 was 73.1% and 92.5% respectively. GPC-3 is a useful marker in the diagnosis of HCC. However it is not superior to Hep Par 1 in its sensitivity and specificity. We recommend that it is utilized together with Hep Par 1 as a panel in the diagnosis of HCC.
为了评估磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖-3(GPC-3)与Hep Par 1相比在肝肿瘤诊断中的效用,一项横断面研究对66例切除的肝肿瘤进行了检测,使用单克隆抗体通过免疫组织化学法检测这些标志物的蛋白表达。在这66例病例中,26例(39.4%)为肝细胞癌(HCC),4例(6.1%)为肝内胆管癌,36例(54.5%)为转移性肿瘤。HCC中Hep Par 1和GPC-3的表达分别为24/26(92.3%)和19/26(73.1%)。相比之下,在非HCC病例中,仅2/40例(5.0%)表达Hep Par 1,包括1例转移性结肠腺癌和1例转移性胃腺癌。GPC-3在3/40例(7.5%)中表达,即1例来源不明的转移性腺癌、1例转移性胃腺癌和1例肝内胆管癌。Hep Par 1的敏感性和特异性分别为92.3%和95%,而GPC-3的敏感性和特异性分别为73.1%和92.5%。GPC-3是HCC诊断中的一个有用标志物。然而,其敏感性和特异性并不优于Hep Par 1。我们建议将其与Hep Par 1联合作为一组指标用于HCC的诊断。