Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Department of Oncology, Garibaldi Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Sep;20(5):825-833. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0681-6. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
Although second-line therapy is often considered for advanced gastric cancer patients, the optimal candidates are not well defined.
We retrospectively collected baseline parameters, tumour features, and treatment data for 868 advanced gastric cancer patients exposed to multiple treatment lines at 19 Italian centres. Cross-tables and chi-square tests were used to describe categorical features. To predict the impact of clinical variables on progression-free survival and overall survival, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed.
At the start of second-line therapy, median age was 64.8 years (25th-75th percentiles: 55.2-71.9 years). Overall, 43% of patients received single-agent chemotherapy, 47.4% a doublet, and 7.3% a triplet. Median second-line progression-free survival was 2.8 months (25th-75th percentiles: 1.8-5.2 months) and median second-line overall survival was 5.6 months (25th-75th percentiles: 2.9-10.0 months). Multivariate analysis showed that performance status, LDH level, neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio, and progression-free survival in the first-line therapy all impacted on prognosis. Based on these four prognostic factors, a prognostic index was constructed that divided patients into good, intermediate, and poor risk groups; median second-line overall survival for each group was 7.7, 4.5, and 2.0 months, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001).
Advanced gastric cancer patients with a favourable ECOG performance status, lower LDH levels, and a lower neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio at the start of second-line therapy seem to have better outcomes, regardless of age and intensity of treatment. A longer progression-free survival in the first-line therapy also had positive prognostic value. Our real-life study might help clinicians to identify the patients who may benefit most from a second-line therapy.
尽管二线治疗通常被认为是晚期胃癌患者的选择,但对于最佳候选者的定义并不明确。
我们回顾性收集了 19 家意大利中心的 868 名接受多线治疗的晚期胃癌患者的基线参数、肿瘤特征和治疗数据。使用交叉表和卡方检验描述分类特征。为了预测临床变量对无进展生存期和总生存期的影响,进行了 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析。
在二线治疗开始时,中位年龄为 64.8 岁(25%至 75%分位数:55.2-71.9 岁)。总体而言,43%的患者接受单药化疗,47.4%接受双药化疗,7.3%接受三药化疗。中位二线无进展生存期为 2.8 个月(25%至 75%分位数:1.8-5.2 个月),中位二线总生存期为 5.6 个月(25%至 75%分位数:2.9-10.0 个月)。多变量分析表明,体能状态、乳酸脱氢酶水平、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和一线治疗中的无进展生存期均影响预后。基于这四个预后因素,构建了一个预后指数,将患者分为低危、中危和高危组;每组的中位二线总生存期分别为 7.7、4.5 和 2.0 个月(对数秩检验 p<0.0001)。
在开始二线治疗时,ECOG 体能状态良好、乳酸脱氢酶水平较低且中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值较低的晚期胃癌患者,无论年龄和治疗强度如何,似乎都有更好的结局。一线治疗中无进展生存期较长也具有积极的预后价值。我们的真实世界研究可能有助于临床医生识别最有可能从二线治疗中获益的患者。