Suppr超能文献

非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林在糖尿病房颤患者中的安全性和有效性:一项III期随机试验的研究水平荟萃分析

Safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in diabetic patients with atrial fibrillation: A study-level meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials.

作者信息

Patti Giuseppe, Di Gioia Giuseppe, Cavallari Ilaria, Nenna Antonio

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 Mar;33(3). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2876. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

Abstract

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs warfarin according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status are not completely characterized. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify whether in these patients the strategy of oral anticoagulation should be tailored to diabetes status. In this study-level meta-analysis, we included 4 randomized phase III trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF; a total of 18 134 patients with DM and 40 454 without DM were overall considered. Incidence of the following outcome measures was evaluated during the follow-up: stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and vascular death. Use of NOACs compared with warfarin reduced stroke/systemic embolism in diabetic (Risk Ratios [RR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; P = .004) and nondiabetic patients (RR 0.83, 0.73-0.93; P = .001) (P for interaction .72). No interaction between diabetes status and benefits of NOACs was found for the occurrence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or intracranial bleeding (P for interaction >.05 for each comparison). Reduction of vascular death rates with NOACs was significant in diabetic patients (4.97% vs 5.99% with warfarin; RR 0.83, 0.72-0.96; P = .01), in whom absolute the reduction of this outcome measure was higher than in nondiabetics (1.02% vs 0.27%), although no interaction was present (P = .23). Results of this meta-analysis support the safety and efficacy of NOACs compared with warfarin in diabetic patients with nonvalvular AF.

摘要

在心房颤动(AF)患者中,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)与华法林相比,根据糖尿病(DM)状态的安全性和有效性尚未完全明确。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以阐明在这些患者中口服抗凝策略是否应根据糖尿病状态进行调整。在这项研究水平的荟萃分析中,我们纳入了4项比较非瓣膜性AF患者使用NOACs和华法林的随机III期试验;总共纳入了18134例糖尿病患者和40454例非糖尿病患者。在随访期间评估以下结局指标的发生率:中风或全身性栓塞、缺血性中风、大出血、颅内出血和血管性死亡。与华法林相比,使用NOACs可降低糖尿病患者(风险比[RR]0.80,95%CI 0.68 - 0.93;P = 0.004)和非糖尿病患者的中风/全身性栓塞发生率(RR 0.83,0.73 - 0.93;P = 0.001)(交互作用P值为0.72)。在缺血性中风、大出血或颅内出血的发生方面,未发现糖尿病状态与NOACs益处之间存在交互作用(每次比较的交互作用P值均>0.05)。在糖尿病患者中,使用NOACs降低血管性死亡率具有显著意义(分别为4.97%和5.99%,使用华法林时;RR 0.83,0.72 - 0.96;P = 0.01),该结局指标的绝对降低率在糖尿病患者中高于非糖尿病患者(分别为1.02%和0.27%),尽管不存在交互作用(P = 0.23)。这项荟萃分析的结果支持在非瓣膜性AF糖尿病患者中,NOACs与华法林相比的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验