Janelsins Michelle C, Heckler Charles E, Peppone Luke J, Kamen Charles, Mustian Karen M, Mohile Supriya G, Magnuson Allison, Kleckner Ian R, Guido Joseph J, Young Kelley L, Conlin Alison K, Weiselberg Lora R, Mitchell Jerry W, Ambrosone Christine A, Ahles Tim A, Morrow Gary R
Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Charles Kamen, Karen M. Mustian, Supriya G. Mohile, Allison Magnuson, Ian R. Kleckner, Joseph J. Guido, and Gary R. Morrow, University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester; Lora R. Weiselberg, North Shore LIJ Health System-National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Lake Success; Christine A. Ambrosone, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kelley L. Young, Kansas City Clinical Oncology Program, Kansas City, MO; Alison K. Conlin, Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Seattle, WA; and Jerry W. Mitchell, Columbus NCORP, Columbus, OH.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):506-514. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5826. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
Purpose Cancer-related cognitive impairment is an important problem for patients with breast cancer, yet its trajectory is not fully understood. Some previous cancer-related cognitive impairment research is limited by heterogeneous populations, small samples, lack of prechemotherapy and longitudinal assessments, use of normative data, and lack of generalizability. We addressed these limitations in a large prospective, longitudinal, nationwide study. Patients and Methods Patients with breast cancer from community oncology clinics and age-matched noncancer controls completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) at prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy and at a 6-month follow-up as an a priori exploratory aim. Longitudinal models compared FACT-Cog scores between patients and controls at the three assessments and adjusted for age, education, race, menopausal status, and baseline reading ability, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. A minimal clinically important difference cutoff determined percentages of impairment over time. Results Of patients, 581 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 53 years; 48% anthracycline-based regimens) and 364 controls (mean age, 53 years) were assessed. Patients reported significantly greater cognitive difficulties on the FACT-Cog total score and four subscales from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy compared with controls as well as from prechemotherapy to 6-month follow-up (all P < .001). Increased baseline anxiety, depression, and decreased cognitive reserve were significantly associated with lower FACT-Cog total scores. Treatment regimen, hormone, or radiation therapy was not significantly associated with FACT-Cog total scores in patients from postchemotherapy to 6-month follow-up. Patients were more likely to report a clinically significant decline in self-reported cognitive function than were controls from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy (45.2% v 10.4%) and from prechemotherapy to 6-month follow-up (36.5% v 13.6%). Conclusion Patients with breast cancer who were treated in community oncology clinics report substantially more cognitive difficulties up to 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy than do age-matched noncancer controls.
目的 癌症相关认知障碍是乳腺癌患者面临的一个重要问题,但其发展轨迹尚未完全明确。以往一些癌症相关认知障碍研究存在人群异质性、样本量小、缺乏化疗前及纵向评估、使用常模数据以及缺乏普遍性等局限性。我们在一项大规模的前瞻性、纵向、全国性研究中解决了这些局限性。
患者与方法 来自社区肿瘤诊所的乳腺癌患者以及年龄匹配的非癌症对照者在化疗前、化疗后以及6个月随访时完成癌症治疗功能评估-认知功能(FACT-Cog)量表,这是一个预先设定的探索性目标。纵向模型比较了患者和对照者在这三次评估时的FACT-Cog得分,并对年龄、教育程度、种族、绝经状态以及基线阅读能力、焦虑和抑郁症状进行了调整。通过最小临床重要差异临界值确定随时间出现认知障碍的百分比。
结果 共评估了581例乳腺癌患者(平均年龄53岁;48%接受基于蒽环类药物的方案)和364例对照者(平均年龄53岁)。与对照者相比,患者在化疗前至化疗后以及化疗前至6个月随访时,在FACT-Cog总分及四个子量表上报告的认知困难显著更多(所有P <.001)。基线焦虑和抑郁增加以及认知储备降低与较低的FACT-Cog总分显著相关。从化疗后到6个月随访期间,治疗方案、激素或放射治疗与患者的FACT-Cog总分无显著相关性。与对照者相比,患者从化疗前到化疗后(45.2%对10.4%)以及从化疗前到6个月随访时(36.5%对13.6%)更有可能报告自我报告的认知功能出现临床显著下降。
结论 在社区肿瘤诊所接受治疗的乳腺癌患者在化疗后长达6个月的时间里报告的认知困难比年龄匹配的非癌症对照者多得多。