Bridgers S L, Wade P B, Ebersole J S
Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1077-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460057013.
Assessment of the importance of interictal epileptiform abnormalities discovered with cassette electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring requires some appreciation of the frequency with which such abnormalities may be encountered in individuals without epilepsy. From a clinical experience involving more than 2500 patients, we have defined a group of 184 patients referred because of headache, with no additional referral information to suggest seizures. Only one (0.5%) of these patients had epileptiform abnormalities on cassette EEG, yielding 95% and 99% confidence limits for the incidence of epileptiform abnormalities in the unselected nonepileptic headache population of 1.5% and 1.8%. Presuming that the incidence of cassette EEG epileptiform abnormalities in the healthy population would be no higher than in this patient group, we suggest that epileptiform abnormalities are no more likely to be incidental findings on cassette EEG monitoring than on routine EEG. Consequently, the detection of such abnormalities seems a worthwhile aspect of cassette EEG interpretation when the goal of monitoring is the detection of evidence to support a diagnosis of epilepsy.
评估通过盒式脑电图(EEG)监测发现的发作间期癫痫样异常的重要性,需要对在无癫痫个体中遇到此类异常的频率有所了解。根据涉及2500多名患者的临床经验,我们确定了一组184名因头痛就诊的患者,没有其他转诊信息提示有癫痫发作。这些患者中只有1名(0.5%)在盒式EEG上有癫痫样异常,得出在未选择的非癫痫性头痛人群中癫痫样异常发生率的95%和99%置信区间分别为1.5%和1.8%。假设健康人群中盒式EEG癫痫样异常的发生率不高于该患者组,我们认为癫痫样异常在盒式EEG监测中作为偶然发现的可能性并不比常规EEG更高。因此,当监测目的是检测支持癫痫诊断的证据时,检测此类异常似乎是盒式EEG解读的一个有价值的方面。