Suppr超能文献

一种基于带试验框架的屈光力矢量的主观验光替代临床常规方法。

An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.

作者信息

María Revert Antonia, Conversa Maria Amparo, Albarrán Diego César, Micó Vicente

机构信息

Departamento de Óptica y Optometría y Ciencias de la Visión, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.

Clínica Baviera Castellón, Castellón, Spain.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jan;37(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/opo.12343.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Subjective refraction determines the final point of refractive error assessment in most clinical environments and its foundations have remained unchanged for decades. The purpose of this paper is to compare the results obtained when monocular subjective refraction is assessed in trial frames by a new clinical procedure based on a pure power vector interpretation with conventional clinical refraction procedures.

METHODS

An alternative clinical routine is described that uses power vector interpretation with implementation in trial frames. Refractive error is determined in terms of: (i) the spherical equivalent (M component), and (ii) a pair of Jackson Crossed Cylinder lenses oriented at 0°/90° (J component) and 45°/135° (J component) for determination of astigmatism. This vector subjective refraction result (VR) is compared separately for right and left eyes of 25 subjects (mean age, 35 ± 4 years) against conventional sphero-cylindrical subjective refraction (RX) using a phoropter. The VR procedure was applied with both conventional tumbling E optotypes (VR1) and modified optotypes with oblique orientation (VR2).

RESULTS

Bland-Altman plots and intra-class correlation coefficient showed good agreement between VR, and RX (with coefficient values above 0.82) and anova showed no significant differences in any of the power vector components between RX and VR. VR1 and VR2 procedure results were similar (p ≥ 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed routine determines the three components of refractive error in power vector notation [M, J , J ], with a refraction time similar to the one used in conventional subjective procedures. The proposed routine could be helpful for inexperienced clinicians and for experienced clinicians in those cases where it is difficult to get a valid starting point for conventional RX (irregular corneas, media opacities, etc.) and for refractive situations/places with inadequate refractive facilities/equipment.

摘要

目的

在大多数临床环境中,主观验光决定了屈光不正评估的最终结果,其基础几十年来一直未变。本文的目的是比较采用基于纯屈光力矢量解释的新临床程序在试镜架上进行单眼主观验光时所获得的结果与传统临床验光程序的结果。

方法

描述了一种替代临床常规方法,该方法在试镜架上采用屈光力矢量解释。屈光不正根据以下方面确定:(i) 等效球镜度(M分量),以及 (ii) 一对分别取向为0°/90°(J分量)和45°/135°(J分量)的交叉柱镜镜片,用于散光的测定。将25名受试者(平均年龄35±4岁)的右眼和左眼的这种矢量主观验光结果(VR)分别与使用综合验光仪的传统球柱镜主观验光(RX)进行比较。VR程序分别应用传统的翻转E视力表(VR1)和具有倾斜取向的改良视力表(VR2)。

结果

布兰德-奥特曼图和组内相关系数显示VR与RX之间具有良好的一致性(系数值高于0.82),方差分析显示RX和VR之间的任何屈光力矢量分量均无显著差异。VR1和VR2程序的结果相似(p≥0.77)。

结论

所提出的常规方法以屈光力矢量表示法[M, J , J ]确定屈光不正的三个分量,验光时间与传统主观程序所用时间相似。所提出的常规方法对于缺乏经验的临床医生以及在传统RX难以获得有效起始点的情况下(不规则角膜、介质混浊等)以及在屈光设施/设备不足的屈光情况/场所的经验丰富的临床医生可能会有所帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验