a Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj-Napoca , Romania.
b Department of Oral Rehabilitation , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj-Napoca , Romania.
Drug Metab Rev. 2017 Feb;49(1):92-104. doi: 10.1080/03602532.2016.1277737. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
Titanium implants are widely used on an increasing number of patients in orthopedic and dental medicine. Despite the good survival rates of these implants, failures that lead to important socio-economic consequences still exist. Recently, research aimed at improving implant fixation, a process called osseointegration, has focused on a new, innovative field: systemic delivery of drugs. Following implant fixation, patients receive systemic drugs that could either impair or enhance osseointegration; these drugs include anabolic and anti-catabolic bone-acting agents in addition to new treatments. Anabolic bone-acting agents include parathyroid hormone (PTH) peptides, simvastatin, prostaglandin EP4 receptor antagonist, vitamin D and strontium ranelate; anti-catabolic bone-acting agents include compounds like calcitonin, biphosphonates, RANK/RANKL/OPG system and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM). Examples of the new therapies include DKK1- and anti-sclerostin antibodies. All classes of treatments have proven to possess positive impacts such as an increase in bone mineral density and on osseointegration. In order to prevent complications from occurring after surgery, some post-operative systemic drugs are administered; these can show an impairment in the osseointegration process. These include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The effects of aspirin, acetaminophen, opioids, adjuvants, anticoagulants and antibiotics in implant fixations are not fully understood, but studies are being carried out to investigate potential ramifications. It is currently accepted that systemic pharmacological agents can either enhance or impair implant osseointegration; therefore, proper drug selection is essential. This review aims to discuss the varying effects of three different classes of treatments on improving this process.
钛植入物在骨科和牙科医学中越来越多地用于大量患者。尽管这些植入物的存活率很高,但仍存在导致重要社会经济后果的失败。最近,旨在改善植入物固定的研究,即骨整合过程,已将重点放在一个新的创新领域:药物的系统输送。在植入物固定后,患者接受可能会损害或增强骨整合的系统药物;这些药物除了新的治疗方法外,还包括合成代谢和抗分解代谢的骨作用剂。合成代谢的骨作用剂包括甲状旁腺激素(PTH)肽、辛伐他汀、前列腺素 EP4 受体拮抗剂、维生素 D 和雷奈酸锶;抗分解代谢的骨作用剂包括降钙素、双膦酸盐、RANK/RANKL/OPG 系统和选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM)等化合物。新疗法的例子包括 DKK1-和抗硬骨素抗体。所有类别的治疗方法都已被证明具有积极影响,例如增加骨矿物质密度和骨整合。为了防止手术后发生并发症,会给患者服用一些术后系统性药物;这些药物可能会对骨整合过程造成损害。其中包括非甾体抗炎药、质子泵抑制剂和选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂。阿司匹林、对乙酰氨基酚、阿片类药物、佐剂、抗凝剂和抗生素在植入物固定中的作用尚未完全了解,但正在进行研究以调查潜在的后果。目前认为,系统药理学药物可以增强或损害植入物的骨整合;因此,适当的药物选择至关重要。本综述旨在讨论三类不同治疗方法对改善这一过程的不同影响。