Soavi Laura, Rosina Manuela, Stefini Roberto, Fratianni Alessia, Cadeo Barbara, Magri Silvia, Latronico Nicola, Fontanella Marco, Signorini Liana
Clinic of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Neurosurgery, ASST - Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Dec 5;7(Suppl 39):S927-S934. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.195228. eCollection 2016.
In order to better define the pathogenic role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage catheters in postoperative patients, we comparatively analyze the clinical course of device and non-device-related meningitis.
This is an observational, partially prospective, study on consecutive adult patients who developed meningitis after undergoing neurosurgical procedures at the Neurosurgery and Neurointensive care Departments, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy, between January 1999 and August 2007.
All 77 consecutive post-neurosurgical meningitis events in 65 patients were included in the analysis. Most were classified as external ventricular drainage (EVD)-related meningitis (23 cases, group A), external spinal drainage (ESD)-related meningitis (12 cases, group B), and non-device-related post-neurosurgical meningitis (30 cases, group C). Proven meningitis was identified in 78.3%, 91.7% and 56.7% of the events, respectively. ESD-related meningitis had a shorter onset time vs EVD and non-device-associated meningitis (3 days 6 and 7 days, respectively). Median antibiotic treatment duration was 20, 17, and 22.5 days in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Overall, 8 patients (34.8%) in group A, 3 (25.0%) in group B, and 3 (10.0%) in group C died. Median time to become afebrile was shorter in group C than in group A (10 days 12 days, = 0.04). Removal of the device later than 48 hours after meningitis onset, as well as implantation of a second device were associated with a slower time of meningitis resolution.
Early device removal and avoiding implantation of a second device were associated with short illness duration. Larger studies are warranted to confirm the conclusions of this study.
为了更好地明确脑脊液(CSF)引流导管在术后患者中的致病作用,我们对与装置相关和非装置相关的脑膜炎的临床病程进行了比较分析。
这是一项对1999年1月至2007年8月期间在意大利布雷西亚市斯佩达利·奇维利医院神经外科和神经重症监护科接受神经外科手术后发生脑膜炎的成年连续患者进行的观察性、部分前瞻性研究。
分析纳入了65例患者的77例连续的神经外科术后脑膜炎事件。大多数被分类为与外部脑室引流(EVD)相关的脑膜炎(23例,A组)、与外部脊髓引流(ESD)相关的脑膜炎(12例,B组)和与装置无关的神经外科术后脑膜炎(30例,C组)。分别在78.3%、91.7%和56.7%的事件中确诊为脑膜炎。与EVD和非装置相关的脑膜炎相比,ESD相关的脑膜炎发病时间更短(分别为3天、6天和7天)。A、B和C组的抗生素治疗中位持续时间分别为20天、17天和22.5天。总体而言,A组8例患者(34.8%)、B组3例患者(25.0%)和C组3例患者(10.0%)死亡。C组退热的中位时间比A组短(10天对12天,P = 0.04)。脑膜炎发作后48小时后取出装置以及植入第二个装置与脑膜炎缓解时间较慢有关。
早期取出装置并避免植入第二个装置与病程较短有关。需要更大规模的研究来证实本研究的结论。