Giunta R E, Horch R E, Prantl L, Fuchs P C, Germann G, Infanger M, Jakubietz R, Kneser U, Langer S, Lehnhardt M, Machens H G, Mailänder P, Pallua N, Reichert B, Schaefer D J, Schaller H-E, Stark G B, Steinau H-U, Vogt P M
Abteilung für Handchirurgie, Plastische Chirurgie und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München.
Plastisch- und Handchirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg FAU, Erlangen.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2016 Dec;48(6):370-373. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121417. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
In addition to the impact factor, research funding also plays a central role in evaluating the academic performance and quality of a researcher, a clinic or a surgical specialty. The scope and quality of research in Plastic Surgery are usually very little known, so that even large funding institutions do not get a full view of research funding in our specialty. Therefore, sometimes traditional structures are not adapted to new needs by the developing younger surgical fields. In peer review sometimes peers are not chosen from the same surgical specialty, but from a different surgical fields being peers in large field of surgery. By this a bias can easily be generated which would not be advantageous for subspecialties such Plastic Surgery. The goal of this paper is to establish an overview in the form of a registry of the German Society of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) in order to make the joint academic achievements more visible in the future. At the same time, a research funding report is to be published for the years 2015 and 2016.
除影响因子外，研究经费在评估研究人员、临床科室或外科专业的学术表现和质量方面也起着核心作用。整形外科学术研究的范围和质量通常鲜为人知，以至于即使是大型资助机构也无法全面了解我们专业的研究经费情况。因此，有时传统结构无法适应新兴的年轻外科领域的新需求。在同行评审中，有时同行并非来自同一外科专业，而是来自大外科领域中不同的外科专业。由此很容易产生偏差，这对整形外科学等亚专业不利。本文的目的是以德国整形重建与美容外科学会（DGPRÄC）登记册的形式进行概述，以便未来能更清晰地展现联合学术成果。同时，还将发布2015年和2016年的研究经费报告。
