Suppr超能文献

在三级儿科中心植入皮下胸部端口时出现严重中性粒细胞减少并非端口移除的危险因素。

Severe Neutropenia at the Time of Implantable Subcutaneous Chest Port Insertion Is Not a Risk Factor for Port Removal at a Tertiary Pediatric Center.

作者信息

Hoss Daniel R, Bedros Antranik A, Mesipam Avinash, Criddle Jared, Smith Jason C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St., Loma Linda, CA 92354.

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St., Loma Linda, CA 92354.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Mar;28(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if severe neutropenia at the time of chest port insertion is a risk factor for port removal and central catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CCABSI) in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2007 to June 2015, 183 consecutive patients (mean age, 9.9 y; range, 0.75-21 y) had a port inserted at a single tertiary pediatric center. Seventy-two had severe neutropenia at the time of port insertion (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] range, 0-500/mm; mean, 185/mm). Follow-up until port removal or death and CCABSI events were recorded.

RESULTS

Within the first 30 days, similar incidences of CCABSI (12.5% of patients with severe neutropenia [n = 9] vs 4.5% of patients without [n = 5]), port removal for infection (2.8% [n = 2] vs 2.7% [n = 3]), and local port infection (2.8% [n = 2] vs 0.9% [n = 1]) were observed in both groups (P > .05), but the rate of CCABSI per 1,000 catheter-days was higher for patients with severe neutropenia (P = .045). Overall, similar incidences of CCABSI (18.1% [n = 13] vs 16.2% [n = 18]), port removal for infection (2.8% [n = 2] vs 7.2% [n = 8]), local port infection (2.8% [n = 2] vs 2.7% [n = 3]), and CCABSIs per 1,000 catheter-days (0.332 vs 0.400) were observed in both groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Port placement in patients with severe neutropenia can be performed without an increased incidence of port removal for infection. The majority of CCABSIs were successfully treated without port removal.

摘要

目的

确定小儿患者在置入胸部端口时出现严重中性粒细胞减少是否是端口移除及中心导管相关血流感染(CCABSI)的危险因素。

材料与方法

2007年5月至2015年6月,183例连续患者(平均年龄9.9岁;范围0.75 - 21岁)在一家三级儿科中心置入端口。72例患者在端口置入时出现严重中性粒细胞减少(绝对中性粒细胞计数[ANC]范围为0 - 500/mm;平均为185/mm)。记录随访至端口移除或死亡以及CCABSI事件。

结果

在最初30天内,两组观察到的CCABSI发生率相似(严重中性粒细胞减少患者中为12.5%[n = 9],无严重中性粒细胞减少患者中为4.5%[n = 5])、因感染而移除端口的发生率相似(2.8%[n = 2]对2.7%[n = 3])以及局部端口感染发生率相似(2.8%[n = 2]对0.9%[n = 1])(P > 0.05),但严重中性粒细胞减少患者每1000导管日的CCABSI发生率更高(P = 0.045)。总体而言,两组观察到的CCABSI发生率相似(18.1%[n = 13]对16.2%[n = 18])、因感染而移除端口的发生率相似(2.8%[n = 2]对7.2%[n = 8])、局部端口感染发生率相似(2.8%[n = 2]对2.7%[n = 3])以及每1000导管日的CCABSI发生率相似(0.332对0.400)(P > 0.05)。

结论

严重中性粒细胞减少患者的端口置入操作不会增加因感染而移除端口的发生率。大多数CCABSI在不移除端口的情况下得到成功治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验