Stepankova Lenka, Kralikova Eva, Zvolska Kamila, Pankova Alexandra, Ovesna Petra, Blaha Milan, Brose Leonie S
Center for Tobacco-Dependent of the 3rd Medical Department-Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Karlovo namesti 32, 128 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital Prague, Studničkova 7, 128 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Jun;51(3):454-463. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9869-6.
Smoking is more prevalent among people with depression. Depression may make cessation more difficult and cessation may affect depression symptoms.
The aims of this study were to assess the associations between (1) baseline depression and 1-year smoking abstinence and (2) abstinence and change in depression.
Observational study using data collected routinely in a smoking cessation clinic in the Czech Republic from 2008 to 2014. Aim 1: N = 3775 patients; 14.3% reported mild and 15.4% moderate/severe baseline depression levels measured using Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Logistic regressions assessed if depression level predicted 1-year biochemically verified abstinence while adjusting for patient and treatment characteristics. Aim 2: N = 835 patients abstinent at 1 year; change in depression was analysed using Chi-square statistics, t test and mixed method analyses of variance.
Rate of abstinence was lower for patients with mild (32.5%, OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.87, p = 0.002) and moderate/severe depression (25.8%; OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74, p < 0.001) compared with patients without depression (40.5%). Across abstinent patients, the majority with baseline depression reported lower depression levels at follow-up. Overall mean (SD) BDI-II scores improved from 9.2 (8.6) to 5.3 (6.1); t(834) = 14.6, p < 0.001. There were significant main effects of time (F(1832) = 880.8, p < 0.001, partial η = 0.51) and baseline depression level (F(2832) = 666.4, p < 0.001, partial η = 0.62) on follow-up depression and a significant depression * time interaction (F(2832) = 296.5, p < 0.001, partial η = 0.42).
In this effective smoking cessation clinic, depression at the start of treatment predicted reduced smoking abstinence 1 year later. Patients abstinent from smoking experienced considerable improvement in depression.
吸烟在抑郁症患者中更为普遍。抑郁症可能使戒烟更加困难,而戒烟可能会影响抑郁症状。
本研究的目的是评估(1)基线抑郁与1年戒烟之间的关联,以及(2)戒烟与抑郁变化之间的关联。
采用观察性研究,使用2008年至2014年在捷克共和国一家戒烟诊所常规收集的数据。目标1:N = 3775名患者;14.3%报告使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)测量的基线抑郁水平为轻度,15.4%为中度/重度。逻辑回归分析在调整患者和治疗特征的同时,评估抑郁水平是否能预测1年生化验证的戒烟情况。目标2:N = 835名在1年时戒烟的患者;使用卡方统计、t检验和混合方差分析来分析抑郁的变化。
与无抑郁的患者(40.5%)相比,轻度抑郁患者(32.5%,OR = 0.68;95%CI:0.54至0.87,p = 0.002)和中度/重度抑郁患者(25.8%;OR = 0.57,95%CI:0.45至0.74,p < 0.001)的戒烟率较低。在所有戒烟患者中,大多数基线有抑郁的患者在随访时抑郁水平较低。总体平均(标准差)BDI-II评分从9.2(8.6)改善到5.3(6.1);t(834)= 14.6,p < 0.001。时间(F(1,832)= 880.8,p < 0.001,偏η = 0.51)和基线抑郁水平(F(2,832)= 666.4,p < 0.001,偏η = 0.62)对随访抑郁有显著的主效应,抑郁*时间存在显著交互作用(F(2,832)= 296.5,p < 0.001,偏η = 0.42)。
在这家有效的戒烟诊所中,治疗开始时的抑郁可预测1年后戒烟率降低。戒烟的患者抑郁状况有显著改善。