Scholz Holger C, Mühldorfer Kristin, Shilton Cathy, Benedict Suresh, Whatmore Adrian M, Blom Jochen, Eisenberg Tobias
Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, Munich and German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Munich, Germany.
Department of Wildlife Diseases, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Germany.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0168872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168872. eCollection 2016.
The genus Brucella comprises various species of both veterinary and human medical importance. All species are genetically highly related to each other, sharing intra-species average nucleotide identities (ANI) of > 99%. Infections occur among various warm-blooded animal species, marine mammals, and humans. Until recently, amphibians had not been recognized as a host for Brucella. In this study, however, we show that novel Brucella species are distributed among exotic frogs worldwide. Comparative recA gene analysis of 36 frog isolates from various continents and different frog species revealed an unexpected high genetic diversity, not observed among classical Brucella species. In phylogenetic reconstructions the isolates consequently formed various clusters and grouped together with atypical more distantly related brucellae, like B. inopinata, strain BO2, and Australian isolates from rodents, some of which were isolated as human pathogens. Of one frog isolate (10RB9215) the genome sequence was determined. Comparative genome analysis of this isolate and the classical Brucella species revealed additional genetic material, absent from classical Brucella species but present in Ochrobactrum, the closest genetic neighbor of Brucella, and in other soil associated genera of the Alphaproteobacteria. The presence of gene clusters encoding for additional metabolic functions, flanked by tRNAs and mobile genetic elements, as well as by bacteriophages is suggestive for a different ecology compared to classical Brucella species. Furthermore it suggests that amphibian isolates may represent a link between free living soil saprophytes and the pathogenic Brucella with a preferred intracellular habitat. We therefore assume that brucellae from frogs have a reservoir in soil and, in contrast to classical brucellae, undergo extensive horizontal gene transfer.
布鲁氏菌属包含多种对兽医和人类医学都很重要的物种。所有物种在基因上彼此高度相关,种内平均核苷酸同一性(ANI)> 99%。感染发生在各种温血动物物种、海洋哺乳动物和人类中。直到最近,两栖动物还未被认为是布鲁氏菌的宿主。然而,在本研究中,我们表明新型布鲁氏菌物种分布于世界各地的外来青蛙中。对来自各大洲和不同青蛙物种的36株青蛙分离株进行的recA基因比较分析显示出意外的高遗传多样性,这在经典布鲁氏菌物种中未观察到。因此,在系统发育重建中,这些分离株形成了不同的簇,并与非典型的、亲缘关系更远的布鲁氏菌聚集在一起,如意外布鲁氏菌BO2菌株,以及来自啮齿动物的澳大利亚分离株,其中一些作为人类病原体分离得到。对一株青蛙分离株(10RB9215)测定了基因组序列。该分离株与经典布鲁氏菌物种的比较基因组分析揭示了额外的遗传物质,这些遗传物质在经典布鲁氏菌物种中不存在,但存在于布鲁氏菌最接近的遗传邻居慢生根瘤菌属以及其他与土壤相关的α-变形菌属中。编码额外代谢功能的基因簇两侧是tRNA和移动遗传元件以及噬菌体,这表明与经典布鲁氏菌物种相比,其生态环境有所不同。此外,这表明两栖动物分离株可能代表了自由生活的土壤腐生菌与具有首选细胞内栖息地的致病性布鲁氏菌之间的联系。因此,我们假设青蛙中的布鲁氏菌在土壤中有一个储存库,并且与经典布鲁氏菌不同,会经历广泛的水平基因转移。