Suppr超能文献

出生环境以及出生证明中记录的新生儿癫痫发作的验证:与南卡罗来纳州1996 - 2013年活产儿医疗补助申请和医院出院摘要的比较

Birth Settings and the Validation of Neonatal Seizures Recorded in Birth Certificates Compared to Medicaid Claims and Hospital Discharge Abstracts Among Live Births in South Carolina, 1996-2013.

作者信息

Li Qing, Jenkins Dorothea D, Kinsman Stephen L

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health (CBEACH), Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2017 May;21(5):1047-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2200-0.

Abstract

Objective Neonatal seizures in the first 28 days of life often reflect underlying brain injury or abnormalities, and measure the quality of perinatal care in out-of-hospital births. Using the 2003 revision of birth certificates only, three studies reported more neonatal seizures recorded among home births ​or planned out-of-hospital births compared to hospital births. However, the validity of recording neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction across birth settings in birth certificates has not been evaluated. We aimed to validate seizure recording in birth certificates across birth settings using multiple datasets. Methods We examined checkbox items "seizures" and "seizure or serious neurologic dysfunction" in the 1989 and 2003 revisions of birth certificates in South Carolina from 1996 to 2013. Gold standards were ICD-9-CM codes 779.0, 345.X, and 780.3 in either hospital discharge abstracts or Medicaid encounters jointly. Results Sensitivity, positive predictive value, false positive rate, and the kappa statistic of neonatal seizures recording were 7%, 66%, 34%, and 0.12 for the 2003 revision of birth certificates in 547,177 hospital births from 2004 to 2013 and 5%, 33%, 67%, and 0.09 for the 1998 revision in 396,776 hospital births from 1996 to 2003, and 0, 0, 100%, -0.002 among 660 intended home births from 2004 to 2013 and 920 home births from 1996 to 2003, respectively. Conclusions for Practice Despite slight improvement across revisions, South Carolina birth certificates under-reported or falsely reported seizures among hospital births and especially home births. Birth certificates alone should not be used to measure neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction.

摘要

目的 出生后28天内的新生儿惊厥通常反映潜在的脑损伤或异常情况,并且可衡量院外分娩的围产期护理质量。仅使用2003年修订版出生证明的三项研究报告称,与医院分娩相比,在家分娩或计划院外分娩中记录的新生儿惊厥更多。然而,出生证明中跨分娩环境记录新生儿惊厥或严重神经功能障碍的有效性尚未得到评估。我们旨在使用多个数据集验证出生证明中跨分娩环境的惊厥记录情况。方法 我们检查了南卡罗来纳州1996年至2013年1989年和2003年修订版出生证明中的“惊厥”和“惊厥或严重神经功能障碍”复选框项目。金标准是医院出院摘要或医疗补助记录中的ICD-9-CM编码779.0、345.X和780.3。结果 2004年至2013年547,177例医院分娩的2003年修订版出生证明中,新生儿惊厥记录的敏感性、阳性预测值、假阳性率和kappa统计量分别为7%、66%、34%和0.12;1996年至2003年396,776例医院分娩的1998年修订版中分别为5%、33%、67%和0.09;2004年至2013年660例计划在家分娩和1996年至2003年920例在家分娩中分别为0、0、100%、-0.002。实践结论 尽管各版本有轻微改进,但南卡罗来纳州出生证明在医院分娩尤其是在家分娩中对惊厥的报告不足或报告有误。不应仅使用出生证明来衡量新生儿惊厥或严重神经功能障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验