• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

勘误:预测伴有1-2枚腋窝前哨淋巴结转移的T1-2期浸润性乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的因素:翁多库兹马伊什评分系统介绍

Erratum: Factors predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in T1-2 invasive breast cancer with 1-2 axillary sentinel lymph node metastases:Presentation of Ondokuz Mayis scoring system.

作者信息

Kuru Bekir, Sullu Yurdanur, Yuruker Savas, Koray Bayrak Ilkay, Ozen Necati

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

J BUON. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):1571.

PMID:28039730
Abstract

In this article published in Volume 21, issue 5, the Results section of the Pubmed abstract appeared as: "There were 68 (33%) and 108 (52%) patients with a the score of ? 4 (predicted probability of ?10%) with a false negative rate (FNR% of 4.4%, and ?5 (predicted probability of ?15%) with a FNR of 7.4%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the Ondokuz Mayis scoring system was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93%)." The correct Results section of the abstract is: "There were 68 (33%) and 108 (52%) patients with a the score of ≤4 (predicted probability of ≤10%) with a false negative rate (FNR) of 4.4%, and ≤5 (predicted probability of ≤15%) with a FNR of 7.4%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the Ondokuz Mayis scoring system was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93)." This error appeared only in the PubMed database and not in the print form of the Journal.

摘要

在发表于第21卷第5期的这篇文章中,Pubmed摘要的结果部分原文如下:“有68名(33%)和108名(52%)患者评分为?4(预测概率?10%),假阴性率(FNR%)为4.4%,评分为?5(预测概率?15%)的患者假阴性率为7.4%。翁多库兹迈伊斯评分系统的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.88(95%CI 0.83 - 0.93%)。”摘要正确的结果部分为:“有68名(33%)和108名(52%)患者评分≤4(预测概率≤10%),假阴性率(FNR)为4.4%,评分≤5(预测概率≤15%)的患者FNR为7.4%。翁多库兹迈伊斯评分系统的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.88(95%CI 0.83 - 0.93)。”此错误仅出现在PubMed数据库中,未出现在该期刊的印刷版中。

相似文献

1
Erratum: Factors predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in T1-2 invasive breast cancer with 1-2 axillary sentinel lymph node metastases:Presentation of Ondokuz Mayis scoring system.勘误:预测伴有1-2枚腋窝前哨淋巴结转移的T1-2期浸润性乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的因素:翁多库兹马伊什评分系统介绍
J BUON. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):1571.
2
Factors predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in T1-2 invasive breast cancer with 1-2 axillary sentinel lymph node metastases: Presentation of Ondokuz Mayis scoring system.T1-2期浸润性乳腺癌伴1-2枚腋窝前哨淋巴结转移患者非前哨淋巴结转移的预测因素:翁多库兹马伊什评分系统介绍
J BUON. 2016 Sept-Oct;21(5):1129-1136.
3
Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study.验证用于预测前哨淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结状态的特农乳腺癌评分:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Feb;113(3):537-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9967-7. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
4
Prospective study found that peripheral lymph node sampling reduced the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.前瞻性研究发现,对乳腺癌患者进行外周淋巴结采样可降低前哨淋巴结活检的假阴性率。
Chin J Cancer. 2016 Apr 4;35:35. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0099-x.
5
False negative rate for intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen section in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients in a single Asian institution.乳腺癌患者术中前哨淋巴结冰冻切片的假阴性率:对一家亚洲单一机构患者的回顾性分析
J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jul;68(7):536-40. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202799. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement: evaluation of two scoring systems.预测有前哨淋巴结受累的乳腺癌患者的非前哨淋巴结状态:两种评分系统的评估。
Breast J. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):134-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00892.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
7
An independent assessment of the 7 nomograms for predicting the probability of additional axillary nodal metastases after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a cohort of British patients with breast cancer.对7个列线图进行独立评估,这些列线图用于预测一组英国乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检阳性后腋窝淋巴结转移的概率。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Aug;14(4):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
8
Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.前哨淋巴结作为乳腺癌患者治疗规划的新标志物。
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;85(3):102-11. doi: 10.1002/jso.20022.
9
Validation of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients an international comparison.MSKCC 列线图预测前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移的验证:国际比较。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(7):538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Total tumor load assessed by one-step nucleic acid amplification assay as an intraoperative predictor for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.通过一步核酸扩增检测评估的肿瘤总负荷作为乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的术中预测指标。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 25.