Suppr超能文献

肱骨近端骨折:2部分、3部分和4部分骨折的非手术治疗与髓内钉固定治疗对比

Proximal humeral fractures: non-operative treatment versus intramedullary nailing in 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures.

作者信息

Lange Mirjam, Brandt Daniel, Mittlmeier Thomas, Gradl Georg

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Orthopedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Munich University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rostock, Medical Center, Germany.

出版信息

Injury. 2016 Dec;47 Suppl 7:S14-S19. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30848-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about non-operative treatment of proximal humerus 4-part and severe displaced fractures as those are normally treated operatively. In this study, we present a historical collective of two level I trauma centers, where all humeral head fractures, despite displaced fractures, received non-operative treatment within a 10 years period. Functional and clinical results of 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures were compared to those after fixed angle intramedullary nailing by matched pair analysis.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2010, 167 patients with 2-, 3- and 4-part humeral head fractures were treated non-operatively in two level I trauma centers in Rostock. Complete clinical, functional and radiographic follow-up were available for 41 patients in the retrospective analysis. The results were compared by matched-pair analysis to a prospective series of 143 patients treated by antegrade intramedullary nailing using a proximal humeral nail. Of these 143 patients complete radiological and clinical 12 months' follow-up was available for 117 patients. Thus, it was possible to built 41 pairs according to age, gender, and fracture type. Statistical significant differences in constant score (CS), pain, activity of daily living (ADL), range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength were evaluated by Wilcoxon test. Furthermore, x-ray analysis of fracture healing and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Operative treatment was not superior to non operative treatment concerning functional results, even in displaced fractures. The only significant difference was found in 3-part-fractures, where better ROM was reached in the non-operative group (p = 0.05). In contrast, there was a tendency toward better activity of daily living (ADL) in intramedullary nailing, but this did not reach statistical significance. X-ray findings revealed better anatomical reconstruction with less valgus and varus displacements after surgery (15% versus 50%, p < 0.005). The complication rate of 37% was higher in the surgery group with a reoperation rate of 32%.

CONCLUSION

In our study, surgical treatment by fixed angle intramedullary nailing (Targon PH) seems not to be superior to non-operative treatment, regardless of fracture type. In 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures functional and clinical results were similar.

摘要

背景

对于肱骨近端四部分骨折及严重移位骨折的非手术治疗,人们了解甚少,因为这些骨折通常采用手术治疗。在本研究中,我们展示了两个一级创伤中心的历史病例集,在这10年期间,所有肱骨头骨折,无论是否移位,均接受了非手术治疗。通过配对分析,将二部分、三部分和四部分骨折的功能及临床结果与角稳定髓内钉固定术后的结果进行比较。

方法

2000年至2010年期间,罗斯托克的两个一级创伤中心对167例二部分、三部分和四部分肱骨头骨折患者进行了非手术治疗。在回顾性分析中,41例患者获得了完整的临床、功能和影像学随访资料。通过配对分析,将结果与143例采用肱骨近端髓内钉行顺行髓内钉固定术的前瞻性系列患者进行比较。在这143例患者中,117例患者获得了12个月完整的影像学和临床随访资料。因此,根据年龄、性别和骨折类型建立了41对配对。采用Wilcoxon检验评估Constant评分(CS)、疼痛、日常生活活动能力(ADL)、活动范围(ROM)和肌肉力量的统计学显著差异。此外,记录骨折愈合的X线分析及并发症情况。

结果

即使是移位骨折,手术治疗在功能结果方面并不优于非手术治疗。唯一显著差异见于三部分骨折,非手术组的ROM更佳(p = 0.05)。相比之下,髓内钉固定术后日常生活活动能力(ADL)有改善趋势,但未达到统计学显著性。X线检查结果显示,术后手术组的解剖重建更佳,内翻和外翻移位更少(15%对50%,p < 0.005)。手术组的并发症发生率为37%,再次手术率为32%,更高。

结论

在我们的研究中,无论骨折类型如何,采用角稳定髓内钉固定术(Targon PH)的手术治疗似乎并不优于非手术治疗。二部分、三部分和四部分骨折的功能及临床结果相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验