• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新手医生实施的婴儿心肺复苏新双拇指胸外按压技术评估:一项随机、交叉、模拟人试验。

Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial.

作者信息

Smereka Jacek, Szarpak Lukasz, Smereka Adam, Leung Steve, Ruetzler Kurt

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):604-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.045. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.045
PMID:28040386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of high-quality chest compressions during CPR for the patients' outcome is undisputed, as it is essential for maintaining vital organ perfusion. The aim of our study is to compare the quality of chest compression (CC) and ventilation among the two current standard techniques with our novel "nTTT" technique in infant CPR.

METHODS

In this randomized crossover, manikin trial, participants performed CCs using three techniques in a randomized sequence: standard two finger technique (TFT); standard two thumb technique (TTHT), and the 'new two-thumb technique' (nTTT). The novel method of CCs in an infant consists in using two thumbs directed at the angle of 90° to the chest while closing the fingers of both hands in a fist.

RESULTS

Median depth compression using the distinct chest compression techniques varied and amounted to 26 [IQR, 25-28] mm for TFT, and 39 [IQR, 39-39] mm for TTHT as well as for nTTT. Best percentage of fully released compressions were received using TFT (100[100-100] %), then in the case of nTTT (99[98-100] %), and the worst in situation where TTHT (18[14-19] %). was used. The fastest chest compression rate was achieved with TFT (134[IQR, 129-135]/min) and the slowest when using nTTT (109 [IQR, 105-111]/min).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that our new nTTT technique's performance, in terms of compression depth, hands-off time, and ventilation quality, is comparable to the current standards. Based on our findings of this initial manikin study, the nTTT technique is superior to TFT in many of parameters that are vital to a quality chest compression during pediatric CPR.

摘要

背景

高质量心肺复苏期间胸外按压对患者预后的影响是无可争议的,因为它对维持重要器官灌注至关重要。我们研究的目的是比较目前两种标准技术与我们新颖的“nTTT”技术在婴儿心肺复苏中胸外按压(CC)和通气的质量。

方法

在这项随机交叉模拟人试验中,参与者按随机顺序使用三种技术进行胸外按压:标准两指法(TFT);标准双拇指法(TTHT),以及“新双拇指法”(nTTT)。婴儿胸外按压的新方法是双手握拳,双拇指与胸部呈90°角。

结果

使用不同胸外按压技术的中位按压深度各不相同,TFT为26[四分位间距,25 - 28]毫米,TTHT和nTTT均为39[四分位间距,39 - 39]毫米。完全放松按压的最佳百分比在使用TFT时为100[100 - 100]%,其次是nTTT(99[98 - 100]%),最差的是使用TTHT时(18[14 - 十九]%)。胸外按压速度最快的是TFT(134[四分位间距,129 - 135]/分钟),使用nTTT时最慢(109[四分位间距,105 - 111]/分钟)。

结论

我们发现,我们的新nTTT技术在按压深度、手离开时间和通气质量方面的表现与当前标准相当。基于我们这项初步模拟人研究的结果,在儿科心肺复苏期间对高质量胸外按压至关重要的许多参数方面,nTTT技术优于TFT。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial.新手医生实施的婴儿心肺复苏新双拇指胸外按压技术评估:一项随机、交叉、模拟人试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):604-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.045. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
2
The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial.护理人员应用的一种新开发的婴儿胸外按压方法的质量:一项随机交叉模拟人试验。
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(6):589-595. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0015. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
3
A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study.婴儿心肺复苏期间三种胸外按压技术及其相关血流动力学效应的随机比较:一项随机人体模型研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;35(10):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial.一种新开发的婴儿胸部按压技术的评估:一项随机交叉人体模型试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(14):e5915. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005915.
5
A Novel Method of Newborn Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study.一种新生儿胸部按压的新方法:一项随机交叉模拟研究。
Front Pediatr. 2018 May 29;6:159. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00159. eCollection 2018.
6
Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option.对于婴儿,标准胸外按压技术是否有其他替代方法?一项关于新的“双拇指握拳”方法的随机人体模型试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9386. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009386.
7
Comparison of two infant chest compression techniques during simulated newborn cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a single rescuer: A randomized, crossover multicenter trial.单施救者行模拟新生儿心肺复苏时两种婴儿胸外按压技术的比较:一项随机、交叉、多中心试验。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(6):761-768. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0090. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Two new chest compression methods might challenge the standard in a simulated infant model.两种新的胸外按压方法可能会在模拟婴儿模型中挑战标准。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;178(10):1529-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03452-2. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
9
Effect of metronome guidance on infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.节拍器指导对婴儿心肺复苏的影响。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):795-801. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03357-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Two-thumb technique is superior to two-finger technique during lone rescuer infant manikin CPR.两指法在单人复苏婴儿模型 CPR 中优于两指法。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jun;81(6):712-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.029. Epub 2010 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Over-the-Head Technique an Alternative for Infant CPR Performed by a Single Rescuer? A Randomized Simulation Study with Lifeguards.头顶按压技术是否是单人实施婴儿心肺复苏术的一种替代方法?一项针对救生员的随机模拟研究。
Pediatr Rep. 2024 Jan 29;16(1):100-109. doi: 10.3390/pediatric16010010.
2
2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.2023 年国际心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学共识及治疗推荐:基础生命支持、高级生命支持、儿科生命支持、新生儿生命支持、教育、实施和团队以及急救任务组的总结。
Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
A Comparison between Three Different Techniques Considering Quality Skills, Fatigue and Hand Pain during a Prolonged Infant Resuscitation: A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.在长时间婴儿复苏过程中考虑质量技能、疲劳和手部疼痛的三种不同技术的比较:与救生员的交叉研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;9(6):910. doi: 10.3390/children9060910.
4
Two-Thumb Technique Is Superior to Two-Finger Technique in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Infants.双手环抱推举法在婴儿模拟院外心脏骤停心肺复苏中的效果优于双指推举法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e018050. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018050. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Dominant versus non-dominant hand during simulated infant CPR using the two-finger technique: a randomised study.使用两指技术进行模拟婴儿心肺复苏时优势手与非优势手的比较:一项随机研究
Resusc Plus. 2021 May 27;7:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100141. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Development of Smart-Ring-Based Chest Compression Depth Feedback Device for High Quality Chest Compressions: A Proof-of-Concept Study.基于智能指环的高质量胸外按压深度反馈装置的研制:概念验证研究。
Biosensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;11(2):35. doi: 10.3390/bios11020035.
7
Two-Thumb or Two-Finger Technique in Infant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by a Single Rescuer? A Meta-Analysis with GOSH Analysis.单人施救者行婴儿心肺复苏的双指或双拇指技术?GOSH 分析的荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 19;17(14):5214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145214.
8
Comparison of standard and alternative methods for chest compressions in a single rescuer infant CPR: A prospective simulation study.单人婴儿心肺复苏中标准与替代方法胸外按压的比较:一项前瞻性模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):e0226632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226632. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.模拟研究中单人对婴儿进行心肺复苏时双拇指环抱法与双指法的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(45):e17853. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017853.
10
How should we teach cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Randomized multi-center study.我们应该如何教授心肺复苏术?随机多中心研究。
Cardiol J. 2021;28(3):439-445. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0092. Epub 2019 Sep 30.