Suppr超能文献

癌症幸存者将如何使用生存护理计划?

How will cancer survivors use survivorship care plans?

作者信息

Kinnane Nicole A, Piper Amanda J, Jefford Michael

机构信息

a Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, a Richard Pratt Legacy , Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.

b Department of Cancer Experiences Research , Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):183-189. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266082. Epub 2016 Dec 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are internationally endorsed as an important tool to enhance post-treatment survivorship care. To support broad implementation of SCPs, we investigated survivors' preferences regarding SCPs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. Eligible patients from 10 clinical services, generally up to 12 months following end of treatment (EOT) were approached in clinics or via telephone. A purpose-designed survey assessed survivors' intended use of a SCP and preferences regarding format and content. Intended minimum sample size of 200.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty surveys were returned (response rate 68%). Of the 230 participants, over 55% had completed treatment within six months, 35% between six and 12 months, and 10% were receiving ongoing treatments. Most (82%) had not received a SCP and more than one third (42%) reported receiving no information resources at EOT. Almost all (98%) desired further information. Most common information elements desired in a SCP: 'list of symptoms to watch out for and report' (76%), 'summary of treatment received' (70%) and 'things I can do to look after myself' (67%). Most common suggested uses were as: 'a record of cancer treatment' (63%), 'a reminder of things to do to look after myself ' (57%) and 'to help me understand my cancer experience' (56%). Over half (52%) would share the information with their general practitioner. Most indicated preference for paper-based SCPs (91%). There was support for both brief (36%) and detailed versions (42%). Over half requested the information be delivered in a face-to-face discussion with a health professional. Regular telephone support from the treating health care team was most commonly suggested as an additional service to support survivors after EOT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although similar to international findings, results suggest alternate ways of providing the information that survivors desire. Most desired SCP elements have been defined. A flexible approach to SCP interventions is justified.

摘要

背景

生存护理计划(SCPs)在国际上被认可为增强治疗后生存护理的重要工具。为支持SCPs的广泛实施,我们调查了幸存者对SCPs的偏好。

材料与方法

本研究在一家综合癌症中心进行。在诊所或通过电话联系了来自10个临床科室的符合条件的患者,这些患者通常在治疗结束(EOT)后长达12个月。一项专门设计的调查评估了幸存者对SCP的预期用途以及对格式和内容的偏好。预期最小样本量为200。

结果

共收回230份调查问卷(回复率68%)。在230名参与者中,超过55%在6个月内完成治疗,35%在6至12个月内完成治疗,10%正在接受持续治疗。大多数(82%)未收到SCP,超过三分之一(42%)报告在EOT时未收到任何信息资源。几乎所有(98%)都希望获得更多信息。SCP中最常见的所需信息元素:“需留意和报告的症状清单”(76%)、“所接受治疗的总结”(70%)以及“我可以采取的自我护理措施”(67%)。最常见的建议用途为:“癌症治疗记录”(63%)、“自我护理事项提醒”(57%)以及“帮助我理解我的癌症经历”(56%)。超过一半(52%)会与他们的全科医生分享这些信息。大多数人表示更喜欢纸质版SCP(91%)。对于简短版(36%)和详细版(42%)都有支持。超过一半的人要求通过与健康专业人员面对面讨论来提供信息。治疗医护团队定期的电话支持是最常被建议作为EOT后支持幸存者的一项额外服务。

结论

尽管与国际研究结果相似,但结果表明了提供幸存者所需信息的其他方式。已确定了最需要的SCP元素。SCP干预采取灵活方法是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验