Monserrate Andrés, Zussman Benjamin, Ozpinar Alp, Niranjan Ajay, Flickinger John C, Gerszten Peter C
Departments of 1 Neurological Surgery and.
Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; and.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jan;42(1):E11. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16356.
OBJECTIVE Cone-beam CT (CBCT) image guidance technology has been widely adopted for spine radiosurgery delivery. There is relatively little experience with spine radiosurgery for intradural tumors using CBCT image guidance. This study prospectively evaluated a series of intradural spine tumors treated with radiosurgery. Patient setup accuracy for spine radiosurgery delivery using CBCT image guidance for intradural spine tumors was determined. METHODS Eighty-two patients with intradural tumors were treated and prospectively evaluated. The positioning deviations of the spine radiosurgery treatments in patients were recorded. Radiosurgery was delivered using a linear accelerator with a beam modulator and CBCT image guidance combined with a robotic couch that allows positioning correction in 3 translational and 3 rotational directions. To measure patient movement, 3 quality assurance CBCTs were performed and recorded in 30 patients: before, halfway, and after the radiosurgery treatment. The positioning data and fused images of planning CT and CBCT from the treatments were analyzed to determine intrafraction patient movements. From each of 3 CBCTs, 3 translational and 3 rotational coordinates were obtained. RESULTS The radiosurgery procedure was successfully completed for all patients. Lesion locations included cervical (22), thoracic (17), lumbar (38), and sacral (5). Tumor histologies included schwannoma (27), neurofibromas (18), meningioma (16), hemangioblastoma (8), and ependymoma (5). The mean prescription dose was 17 Gy (range 12-27 Gy) delivered in 1-3 fractions. At the halfway point of the radiation, the translational variations and standard deviations were 0.4 ± 0.5, 0.5 ± 0.8, and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm in the lateral (x), longitudinal (y), and anteroposterior (z) directions, respectively. Similarly, the variations immediately after treatment were 0.5 ± 0.4, 0.5 ± 0.6, and 0.6 ± 0.5 mm along x, y, and z directions, respectively. The mean rotational angles were 0.3° ± 0.4°, 0.3° ± 0.4°, and 0.3° ± 0.4° along yaw, roll, and pitch, respectively, at the halfway point and 0.5° ± 0.5°, 0.4° ± 0.5°, and 0.2° ± 0.3° immediately after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Radiosurgery offers an alternative treatment option for intradural spine tumors in patients who may not be optimal candidates for open surgery. CBCT image guidance for patient setup for spine radiosurgery is accurate and successful in patients with intradural tumors.
目的 锥形束CT(CBCT)图像引导技术已广泛应用于脊柱放射外科治疗。使用CBCT图像引导进行硬脊膜内肿瘤的脊柱放射外科治疗的经验相对较少。本研究前瞻性评估了一系列接受放射外科治疗的硬脊膜内脊柱肿瘤。确定了使用CBCT图像引导进行硬脊膜内脊柱肿瘤的脊柱放射外科治疗的患者摆位精度。方法 对82例硬脊膜内肿瘤患者进行治疗并前瞻性评估。记录患者脊柱放射外科治疗中的定位偏差。使用带有射束调制器的直线加速器和CBCT图像引导,并结合可在3个平移方向和3个旋转方向进行定位校正的机器人治疗床进行放射外科治疗。为测量患者的运动,在30例患者中进行并记录了3次质量保证CBCT:放射外科治疗前、治疗中途和治疗后。分析治疗的计划CT和CBCT的定位数据及融合图像,以确定分次治疗期间患者的运动。从3次CBCT中的每次中获取3个平移坐标和3个旋转坐标。结果 所有患者均成功完成放射外科治疗。病变部位包括颈椎(22例)、胸椎(17例)、腰椎(38例)和骶椎(5例)。肿瘤组织学类型包括神经鞘瘤(27例)、神经纤维瘤(18例)、脑膜瘤(16例)、成血管细胞瘤(8例)和室管膜瘤(5例)。平均处方剂量为17 Gy(范围12 - 27 Gy),分1 - 3次给予。在放疗中途,横向(x)、纵向(y)和前后(z)方向的平移变化及标准差分别为0.4±0.5、0.5±0.8和0.4±0.5 mm。同样,治疗后即刻沿x、y和z方向的变化分别为0.5±0.4、0.5±0.6和0.6±0.5 mm。在中途时,偏航、横滚和俯仰方向的平均旋转角度分别为0.3°±0.4°、0.3°±0.4°和0.3°±0.4°,治疗后即刻分别为0.5°±0.5°、0.4°±0.5°和0.2°±0.3°。结论 对于可能不是开放手术最佳候选者的硬脊膜内脊柱肿瘤患者,放射外科提供了一种替代治疗选择。CBCT图像引导用于硬脊膜内肿瘤患者的脊柱放射外科摆位准确且成功。