Lin Tien-Yu, Chen Chung-Yu, Huang Yaw-Bin
School of Pharmacy, Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
School of Pharmacy, Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:378-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.098. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
According to guidelines and pivotal trials, β-blockers are associated with better survival in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the superiority of any β-blockers is still unclear.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to evaluate the effectiveness of β-blockers and compare the clinical outcomes of different β-blockers in patients with HF. We enrolled patients diagnosed with HF between 2005 and 2012. We then stratified the β-blockers according to the starting dose: lower in group 1 and higher in group 2. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the β-blockers.
A total of 14,875 patients with HF were identified during the study period. After propensity-score matching, 5688 patients were included in both the β-blocker user and nonuser groups. We found that group 2 carvedilol and group 2 bisoprolol significantly reduced the risk of death and hospitalization for HF, whereas metoprolol did not. Compared with group 2 carvedilol, survival was not significantly different for group 2 bisoprolol (adjusted hazard ratio=1.18, 95% confidence interval=0.88-1.58).
From results, carvedilol and bisoprolol were associated with better outcomes, with no difference between these two β-blockers in patients with HF in Taiwan.
根据指南和关键试验,β受体阻滞剂与心力衰竭(HF)患者更好的生存率相关。然而,任何一种β受体阻滞剂的优越性仍不明确。
本回顾性队列研究利用台湾地区国民健康保险研究数据库进行,以评估β受体阻滞剂的有效性,并比较不同β受体阻滞剂在HF患者中的临床结局。我们纳入了2005年至2012年间被诊断为HF的患者。然后我们根据起始剂量对β受体阻滞剂进行分层:第1组剂量较低,第2组剂量较高。应用时间依赖性Cox比例风险回归模型评估β受体阻滞剂的有效性。
在研究期间共识别出14875例HF患者。经过倾向评分匹配后,β受体阻滞剂使用者组和非使用者组均纳入5688例患者。我们发现,第2组卡维地洛和第2组比索洛尔显著降低了HF死亡和住院风险,而美托洛尔则没有。与第2组卡维地洛相比,第2组比索洛尔的生存率无显著差异(调整后风险比=1.18,95%置信区间=0.88-1.58)。
从结果来看,卡维地洛和比索洛尔与更好的结局相关,在台湾地区HF患者中这两种β受体阻滞剂之间无差异。