Suppr超能文献

评估不同β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭患者的疗效。

Evaluating the effectiveness of different beta-adrenoceptor blockers in heart failure patients.

作者信息

Lin Tien-Yu, Chen Chung-Yu, Huang Yaw-Bin

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

School of Pharmacy, Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:378-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.098. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to guidelines and pivotal trials, β-blockers are associated with better survival in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the superiority of any β-blockers is still unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to evaluate the effectiveness of β-blockers and compare the clinical outcomes of different β-blockers in patients with HF. We enrolled patients diagnosed with HF between 2005 and 2012. We then stratified the β-blockers according to the starting dose: lower in group 1 and higher in group 2. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the β-blockers.

RESULTS

A total of 14,875 patients with HF were identified during the study period. After propensity-score matching, 5688 patients were included in both the β-blocker user and nonuser groups. We found that group 2 carvedilol and group 2 bisoprolol significantly reduced the risk of death and hospitalization for HF, whereas metoprolol did not. Compared with group 2 carvedilol, survival was not significantly different for group 2 bisoprolol (adjusted hazard ratio=1.18, 95% confidence interval=0.88-1.58).

CONCLUSION

From results, carvedilol and bisoprolol were associated with better outcomes, with no difference between these two β-blockers in patients with HF in Taiwan.

摘要

背景

根据指南和关键试验,β受体阻滞剂与心力衰竭(HF)患者更好的生存率相关。然而,任何一种β受体阻滞剂的优越性仍不明确。

方法

本回顾性队列研究利用台湾地区国民健康保险研究数据库进行,以评估β受体阻滞剂的有效性,并比较不同β受体阻滞剂在HF患者中的临床结局。我们纳入了2005年至2012年间被诊断为HF的患者。然后我们根据起始剂量对β受体阻滞剂进行分层:第1组剂量较低,第2组剂量较高。应用时间依赖性Cox比例风险回归模型评估β受体阻滞剂的有效性。

结果

在研究期间共识别出14875例HF患者。经过倾向评分匹配后,β受体阻滞剂使用者组和非使用者组均纳入5688例患者。我们发现,第2组卡维地洛和第2组比索洛尔显著降低了HF死亡和住院风险,而美托洛尔则没有。与第2组卡维地洛相比,第2组比索洛尔的生存率无显著差异(调整后风险比=1.18,95%置信区间=0.88-1.58)。

结论

从结果来看,卡维地洛和比索洛尔与更好的结局相关,在台湾地区HF患者中这两种β受体阻滞剂之间无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验